Select Page

Health Secretary, Wes Streeting, warns assisted suicide would come “at the expense” of other NHS services

The Health Secretary has ordered a review of the costs of implementing assisted suicide if Kim Leadbeater’s assisted suicide Bill is passed later this month, warning of a “chilling” scenario in which patients are pressured into ending their lives, and saying assisted suicide would “come at the expense of other choices”.

In the same week as Kim Leadbeater published her Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill ahead of MPs voting on it on 29 November, Wes Streeting has asked his department to produce a detailed report on the cost of assisted suicide were it to become legal and has raised concerns that cuts will have to be made elsewhere in the NHS.

“I would hate for people to opt for assisted dying because they think they’re saving someone somewhere money, whether that’s relatives or the NHS. And I think that’s one of the issues that MPs are wrestling with as they decide how to cast their vote”, he said.

Implementing assisted suicide means cutting back on other services

Speaking to reporters at the NHS Providers conference in Liverpool, when asked about Leadbeater’s Bill he said “Now that we’ve seen the bill published, I’ve asked my department to look at the costs that would be associated with providing a new service to enable assisted dying to go forward”.

“That work is now under way, so I can’t give you a precise figure today. You do touch on… the potential for cost savings if people choose to opt for assisted dying rather than stay in the care of providers or the NHS. I think that is a chilling slippery slope argument”.

Delivering assisted suicide would “come at the expense of other competing pressures and priorities”, he added.

Earlier on Wednesday, Streeting told Times Radio that “Those choices [to implement assisted suicide] would come at the expense of other choices”.

“To govern is to choose. If parliament chooses to go ahead with assisted dying, it is making a choice that this is an area to prioritise for investment. And we’d have to work through those implications”.

There has been some controversy over Streeting’s comments with UK Editor of ITV News, Paul Brand, reporting on X that “MPs tell me Wes Streeting has upset a fair number of colleagues today with his further interventions on assisted dying”.

Responding to Brand’s comments, Sonia Sodha, writer at the Observer and a Guardian/Observer columnist, said that it is “right for Wes Streeting to ask his department to estimate the resource implications of legalising assisted dying for the NHS – it’s very striking it’s not been done, for govt legislation it would have been. It’s info MPs need to form a view on the bill”.

“If this [Streeting’s report request] is what MP colleagues are upset about, it’s a bit worrying”.

The Cabinet remains deeply divided on assisted suicide and even the Prime Minister, who previously voted in favour of making assisted suicide legal in 2015 and has been an outspoken supporter of a change in the law since, has now said he has not decided how he will vote.

Spokesperson for Right To Life UK, Catherine Robinson, said “The Health Secretary is right to suggest assisted suicide will come at the cost of other services. Available services should be directed towards assisting people at the end of their lives to live, not to die”.

Critical appealto protect vulnerable lives

Help stop three major anti-life threats.

The Leadbeater assisted suicide Bill can still be defeated at Third Reading, but only with your help.

Dear reader,

As you already likely know, the Leadbeater assisted suicide Bill sadly passed Second Reading at the end of last month.

While it is very disappointing that the Bill passed Second Reading, an analysis published in The Independent shows that at least 36 MPs who supported the Bill did so only to allow further debate or because they had concerns that meant they won’t commit to supporting the Bill at Third Reading. Since then, our Public Affairs team has identified a number of other MPs who share these reservations.

With the vote passing by a margin of 55, just 28 MPs switching their stance to oppose the Bill would ensure it is defeated at Third Reading, so there is a clear path towards this Bill being defeated. We can still win this.

The assisted suicide lobby are fully aware that support for the Bill is very fragile. They will fight fiercely to prevent 28 MPs from switching their votes to oppose the Bill.

For the sake of the hundreds of thousands of vulnerable lives that will be put at risk, we must win the vote and defeat this dangerous Bill.

WE NEED YOUR HELP

Our campaign in the run-up to Second Reading was the biggest and most expensive we have ever run and so it has made a significant dent in our limited financial resources.

We are now working on an even bigger campaign to defeat this dangerous Bill at Third Reading.

To ensure we effectively defeat this extreme assisted suicide Bill, we are aiming to raise at least £100,000 by midnight this Sunday (15 December 2024).

Every donation, no matter the size, will mean YOU can make a crucial difference in saving vulnerable lives from this extreme law change.

Will you make a donation now to help protect vulnerable lives from this major threat?

Critical appealto protect vulnerable lives

Help stop three major anti-life threats.

The Leadbeater assisted suicide Bill can still be defeated at Third Reading, but only with your help.