Select Page

Canada euthanises more prisoners than any other country

In the past seven years, Canada has euthanised more prisoners than anywhere else that tracks and records such data, and evidence suggests that some are using it to escape their prison sentences.

Nine prisoners in Canada have been euthanised in the last seven years and critics are deeply concerned because of the lack of transparency and outside scrutiny.

Jessica Shaw, an academic at the University of Calgary, filed a freedom of information request about euthanasia in prisons in Canada and found that a third of all prisoner requests for euthanasia are approved. This is considerably lower than the approval rate of 81% in the general population but no explanation was provided.

A spokesperson for Correctional Services of Canada (CSC) told CTV News “For privacy reasons, we are currently unable to provide a further breakdown of these numbers”.

Shaw described the lack of details as “secretive in many ways”, adding that “[w]e worry about what’s happening, (and) what’s not happening, behind bars and behind closed doors”.

She told CTV News “It would appear to me that there’s a very different process when it comes to people who are dying through assisted death in prison than it is for… the general population of Canada.”

Ivan Zinger, the correctional investigator of Canada, also spoke with CTV News about the troubling lack of transparency. As part of his role, he is required to investigate all deaths in custody, except cases of assisted suicide and euthanasia.

“For some extraordinary reason, CSC was able to get an exemption [to] that requirement”, he said.

“We keep raising [the matter], but we don’t have data and they don’t have the obligation to provide us with data. And that’s the problem.”

Potential for coercion

Shaw has raised concerns regarding the presence of prison guards who may, even inadvertently, put pressure on prisoners.

“We really need to attend to whether or not someone can adequately consent when they’re being watched by a prison guard, for example… or whether anyone has free choice when so many of their rights have been taken away”, she said.

In her time interviewing prisoners, Shaw also found that, for some of them, euthanasia and assisted suicide are viewed as means to escape their prison sentence.  One inmate, James (not his real name), told her “[W]hy not give us another option? Instead of having the taxpayers pay millions of dollars (for our prison time), why not just give us that option to go to [be euthanised]?”

A 2015 study from Belgium highlighted just this problem.

Researchers found 17 requests for euthanasia had been made by long-term prisoners who were “motivated by the constant and unbearable psychological suffering of detention.”

Both Zinger and Shaw have also raised concerns about the impact of making euthanasia available on the grounds of mental illness alone. Zinger says that the data indicates that as many as 75% of those in federal prisons have a mental health diagnosis and studies have indicated that prisons can make mental health worse.

“If the provisions are extended to include mental illness, there could be a lot more people that become eligible”, Zinger said.

Right To Life UK spokesperson Catherine Robinson said “The issues related to transparency are a concern and CSC should be open about the administration of euthanasia in Canadian prisons. More significantly though, discoveries about prisoners wanting to “escape” their sentences through death, as well as concerns about just how freely consent might be given for some prisoners, are entirely predictable outcomes of making euthanasia a right for prisoners.”

EMERGENCY
APPEAL
to SAVE
lives

Help stop three major anti-life threats.

Help stop three major anti-life threats.

Dear reader,

Thanks to the hard work and dedication of people like you across the UK, the McArthur assisted suicide Bill in Scotland was defeated in March by 69 votes to 57.

Then, in April, the Leadbeater assisted suicide Bill fell in the House of Lords.

Many commentators thought both Bills would become law.

If that had happened, governments in England, Scotland and Wales would now be preparing to roll out assisted suicide services.

Over the coming decades, this would have led to the deaths of many thousands of vulnerable people.

But that is not what happened.

Because supporters like you acted, those Bills were stopped.

Because of you, many vulnerable lives have been saved.

These were two very significant victories. But sadly, they are not the last battles we face this year.

The new Parliamentary session began on Wednesday. We now face three major threats.

  1. Attempts to bring back the Leadbeater assisted suicide Bill and bypass the House of Lords

    The assisted suicide lobby, led by Dignity in Dying, a multi-million-pound pressure group, has made it clear that it is going to attempt to bring back the Leadbeater assisted suicide Bill in the next parliamentary session.

    It then plans to use the Parliament Acts to bypass the House of Lords and force the Bill into law.

  2. Labour Government plans for a major expansion of abortion provision, including financial incentives for ‘lunch-hour’ abortions

    Under these plans, the Government would financially incentivise major abortion providers, BPAS and MSI Reproductive Choices, to provide ‘lunch-hour’ or ‘same-day’ abortions.

    ‘Lunch-hour’ abortion services are walk-in abortion services designed to fit into a woman’s lunch hour.

    Women facing an unplanned pregnancy need time, care and support, not a system that gives abortion clinics a financial incentive to rush them through consultations, scans and abortions on the same day.

    If these plans go ahead, many more lives are likely to be ended by abortion here in the UK.

  3. Extreme abortion up to birth proposals in Scotland

    In Scotland, plans are moving forward to introduce an extreme abortion up to birth law. This would go far beyond the abortion law change recently backed by the Lords for England and Wales.

    A review of abortion law in Scotland, commissioned by Humza Yousaf when he was Scottish First Minister, recommended that the Scottish Government scrap the current 24-week time limit – and abortion be available on social grounds, including for sex-selective purposes, right up to birth.

    The final plans are expected to be brought forward as a Government Bill in the new Scottish Parliament, which begins this Thursday.

If these three major threats succeed, thousands of vulnerable lives will be lost.

We cannot allow this to happen.

We can only defeat these three major threats with your help.

We ran our biggest campaigns ever to help defeat the assisted suicide Bills at Westminster and in Scotland.

That work has made a serious dent in our limited resources.

To cover this gap and ensure we can effectively defeat these three major threats in the coming months, we are aiming to raise at least £199,250 by midnight this Sunday (17 May 2026).

We are, therefore, appealing to you to please give as generously as you can.

Every donation, large or small, will make a crucial difference in saving the lives of the unborn and many others. Plus, if you are a UK taxpayer, £1 becomes £1.25 with Gift Aid at no extra cost to you.

By stopping these threats, YOU can save lives during this new Parliamentary session.

Will you donate now to help protect vulnerable lives from these three major threats?

EMERGENCY
APPEAL
to SAVE
lives

Help stop three major anti-life threats.

Help stop three major anti-life threats.