Select Page

Disney subsidiary pays for travel for abortions whilst slashing maternity leave

Disney subsidiary, Hulu, has slashed maternity and paternity leave at the same time as it has offered to pay for employees to travel to other states to obtain abortions.

Since the overturning of the abortion law in the US, which gave states the power to make their own abortion law earlier this year, a number of major US corporations, including Disney, announced that they would cover the cost of an employee’s travel across state lines for an abortion.

Now, however, the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reports that Hulu, a streaming service owned by Disney, is dramatically cutting back on maternity and paternity benefits. According to the WSJ report, Hulu cut its paid parental leave policy from 20 weeks down to just 8 weeks – a 60% reduction.

Furthermore, the WSJ reports a survey of 3,000 employers found that only 35% now offer paid maternity leave benefits beyond what is mandated by federal law, down from 53% in 2020.

“Companies are sending a not-so-subtle signal to women who want to start a family, and places on them a higher financial burden from the start”.

The impact of the cuts to parental leave at Hulu are already being felt by one working family interviewed for the story: “If my job is cutting back on my parental leave, how am I going to afford child care if I don’t get paid more?” asked Devon Richey, a Texas-based Hulu employee.

At the same time as reducing benefits for families, Disney announced in June that they “remain committed to providing comprehensive access to quality and affordable care for all of our employees, cast members and their families, including family planning and [abortion], no matter where they live”.

Laura Nicole of Live Action News said: “By coming out so enthusiastically in support of abortion while cutting back on parental leave benefits, companies are sending a not-so-subtle signal to women who want to start a family, and places on them a higher financial burden from the start”.

Paying for abortion travel

Earlier this year, Reuters reported that Amazon told its staff that it would reimburse travel expenses for any of its staff travelling more than a hundred miles for an abortion.

In a message to its staff, the company said it would pay up to $4,000 (£3,201) in travel expenses each year for medical interventions including abortion. Amazon’s new scheme will apply retroactively from the beginning of this year.

The president of pro-life group Live Action, Lila Rose, called Amazon out for the new policy. She said it was a way for Amazon to avoid paying maternity fees and get more work out of its employees.

She tweeted: “The ultimate ‘F U’ any boss can give their female employees: I will literally pay 4k for you to kill your child so I don’t need to pay for maternity leave & so you can work extra long hours for me. Extraordinarily gross, @JeffBezos. @amazon”.

The bank, Citigroup, review company, Yelp, and dating app, Bumble, all announced similar policies this year.

Right To Life UK spokesperson Catherine Robinson said: “Disney is now actively creating incentives for its employees at Hulu to have abortions rather than pursue parenthood. Not only is it paying for travel to procure an abortion, it is also slashing benefits for parents. This is a gross form of utilitarian calculation where it appears that it is seen as cheaper to encourage an employee to have an abortion rather than provide benefits to assist with childrearing”.

Dear reader,

On Friday 11 September, MPs will vote on the revived assisted suicide Bill.

Only 12 MPs need to change their minds and switch from voting yes to no for the new assisted suicide Bill to be defeated. This is a vote we can win – but MPs need to hear from their constituents now.

The Prime Minister, Andy Burnham, has delivered a major setback to the assisted suicide lobby. He has said that palliative and social care funding should be fixed before Parliament considers assisted suicide.

This marks a significant change from his predecessor, Keir Starmer, who publicly backed and voted for the previous assisted suicide Bill.

His intervention creates a real opportunity to persuade MPs who supported the previous Bill to reconsider.

Even if you have contacted your MP before, please email them again. This is a new Bill and a new vote. Whether they supported or opposed the previous Bill, the result could be extremely close, and they need to hear from you before 11 September.

We have launched a simple tool which makes it easy to contact your MP to ask them to vote NO on 11 September. It takes only 30 seconds to send your email.

Please take action now and click the button below to contact your MP.