Select Page

Female athletes speak up about being pressured into abortion

Sanya Richards-Ross, a former Olympic track and field athlete, has spoken out about being pressured into an abortion.

Speaking about her journey to an abortion clinic in her new book she said:  “I knew I was at a crossroads. Everything I ever wanted seemed to be within reach. The culmination of a lifetime of work was right before me. In that moment, it seemed like no choice at all… All of the crying leading up to that moment had left me so numb that I barely remember the cold instruments as they brushed against my skin”.

“I made a decision that broke me”.

The next day she boarded a flight to Beijing to compete in the 2008 Olympic Games. She did not tell her coaches, her teammates, or her father. She wrote of how, in the individual 400 metre sprint, her feelings of shame, guilt, and unworthiness over feeling pressured into the procedure affected her performance and resulted in her third-place finish instead of the Olympic gold she had been the favourite to win. She felt: “I made a decision that broke me”.

She told Sports Illustrated Now, “I literally don’t know another female track athlete who hasn’t had an abortion…and that’s sad”. She gave her opinion that the situation could be attributed to misinformation spread by peers on college campuses that pregnancy is impossible for women athletes who have lost their menstrual cycles due to intense exercise.

Richards-Ross’ description of feeling she had “no choice at all” and risked losing her work if she did not get an abortion speaks to a toxic culture that encourages athletes to do “whatever it takes” to perform at the highest level, even if it means ending a pregnancy they wish to continue with. 

Christina Pirrotta, a rising fourth-year student at the University of Chicago who plays on her university’s football team told VerilyMag: “I know as an athlete that so much of our identity is centered around the sport we play and we have so many ambitions and hopes for what we can do. While I know the timing for her pregnancy wasn’t ideal, I believe that [Brianna] McNeal would have still found her way in life—as a mother and as an athlete”.

Pirrotta is involved with Students for Life of America, an organisation that has created a “Pregnant on Campus Bill of Rights” to help educate women about protection they’re entitled to. She went on: “I think women who have unplanned pregnancies are in a very difficult spot because at least in the current moment it may seem like so much is ending”.

Forcing vulnerable women into abortion clinics

For student athletes in the US, scholarship money is also a major concern. The Entertainment and Sports Programming Network (ESPN) contacted hundreds of administrators and athletes. Their investigation revealed policies that essentially forced vulnerable women into abortion clinics. At least seven athletes at Clemson University in South Carolina had undergone abortions due to fear of losing their places on their sports teams — and their corresponding financial support. 

One student told ESPN they had signed a document that stated: “Pregnancy resulting in the inability to compete and positively contribute to the program’s success will result in the modification of your grant-in-aid money”, and described undergoing a second abortion after being warned about her scholarship by a university administrator.

ESPN also spoke to Cassandra Harding, who attempted to access an abortion to preserve her track scholarship at the University of Memphis, however she discovered she was four months pregnant and had thus passed the legal abortion limit. She had also signed a policy that specified pregnancy as a violation of her scholarship would cause “immediate dismissal and nonrenewal of scholarship”. Indeed, her coaches followed through with this policy and cut Harding’s scholarship off after they learned she was having a baby.

Illegal under US law

Not only are these policies morally abhorrent, but under Title IX, a federal civil rights law in the US intended to prevent sex discrimination, any university or school that receives federal money cannot legally discriminate against students because of their sex or parental status.

A series of New York Times articles in 2019 also revealed multiple testimonies from women who reported losing sponsorship money from Nike after they gave birth. Phoebe Wright, a sponsored track star, said “getting pregnant is the kiss of death for a female athlete”. 

Olympic gold medalist Allyson Felix also wrote in a New York Times editorial that her decision to have a child was “terrifying” because it coincided with renegotiating her Nike contract. She also revealed that the company wanted to reduce her pay by 70 per cent, and refused to provide financial protection if her performance dipped during or after pregnancy.

She went on, “Athletes are told to shut up and play. We are told that no one cares about our politics. We are told that we’re just entertainers, so run fast, jump high, and throw far. And don’t mess up. But pregnancy is not messing up; for women, it can and should be able to be part of a thriving professional athletic career”.

Felix is now sponsored by Athleta, a women’s apparel brand that offers full maternity benefits, and she recently spoke out again to say that during the process of the discriminatory contract negotiations that led her to severe ties, Nike requested that she participate in “female empowerment” advertisements. “My stomach dropped. I was like, this is just beyond disrespectful and tone-deaf”, she told Time magazine.

A spokesperson for Right To Life UK, Catherine Robinson, said: “It is utterly despicable that modern educational institutions and corporations routinely pressure women athletes into abortions, as is evident from these athletes’ heartbreaking testimonies”.

“While it is good news that brands like Athleta are making a step in the right direction by offering full maternity benefits, more brands and universities must change their behaviour for this to make a general impact on the treatment of female athletes”.

“Sadly this stigmatisation of pregnant women and pressure to abort is not exclusive to the sports industry. Earlier this year, singer Sinead O’Connor spoke out about how she was pressured to abort her baby and recalled the doctor saying: “Your record company has spent £100,000 recording your album. You owe it to them not to have this baby”.

“UK polling has also shown that a shocking 7% of British women have been pressured into an abortion by their husband or partner. The story of these athletes and many others thus firmly contradicts the idea that abortion is always the ‘choice’ it is claimed to be”.

URGENT
APPEAL
to protect vulnerable lives

Help stop three major anti-life threats.

Help fight the next phase of our battles against major assisted suicide and abortion up to birth threats.

Dear reader,

We are facing two major threats in the Lords - an extreme assisted suicide Bill and an abortion up to birth amendment.

THE GOOD NEWS - OUR STRATEGY IS WORKING

At Second Reading of the Leadbeater assisted suicide Bill in the House of Lords, a record number of Peers spoke, and of those who took a position, around two-thirds opposed the assisted suicide Bill. That is more than double the number who supported it.

Our side also secured a significant win, with the establishment of a dedicated Lords Select Committee to further scrutinise the Bill’s proposals – and Committee Stage has been delayed until it reports.

This momentum has been built by tens of thousands of people like you. Thanks to your hard work, Peers are receiving a very large number of emails and letters by post, making the case against the Bill. 

Thanks to your support, we have been able to mount a major campaign in Parliament, in the media and online – alongside your own efforts – to keep us on course for our goal: that this dangerous Bill never becomes law.

BUT MORE CHALLENGES LIE AHEAD

We cannot become complacent. Well-funded groups - Dignity in Dying, My Death My Decision and Humanists UK - have poured millions into pushing assisted suicide. They can see support is slipping and will fight hard to reverse that.

This is not the only fight we are facing in the House of Lords.

At the same time, the Antoniazzi abortion up to birth amendment, which passed in the House of Commons in June, is moving through the House of Lords as part of the Crime and Policing Bill.

Second Reading will take place in a matter of weeks. It will then go on to Committee and Report Stages, where we will be up against the UK’s largest abortion providers – BPAS and MSI Reproductive Choices (formerly Marie Stopes) – who are expected to lobby for even more extreme changes to our abortion laws.

If the Antoniazzi amendment becomes law, it would no longer be illegal for women to perform their own abortions for any reason – including sex-selective purposes – at any point up to and during birth.

Thousands of vulnerable lives - at the beginning and the end of life - depend on what happens next. We must do everything in our power to stop these radical proposals.

WE NEED YOUR HELP

Our campaign against the Leadbeater Bill in the House of Lords is working, but the work we have already done has significantly stretched our limited resources.

We are now stepping up our efforts against the assisted suicide Bill while launching a major push to stop the abortion up to birth amendment in the Lords. 

To fight effectively on both fronts, we aim to raise £183,750 by midnight this Sunday (5 October 2025).

Every donation, large or small, will help protect lives, and UK taxpayers can add 25p to every £1 through Gift Aid at no extra cost.

Will you donate now to help protect vulnerable lives from these two major threats?

URGENT
APPEAL
to protect vulnerable lives

Help stop three major anti-life threats.

Help fight the next phase of our battles against major assisted suicide and abortion up to birth threats.