Select Page

Why Denmark’s Council of Ethics advised against legalising euthanasia 

An overwhelming majority of the Danish Council of Ethics has advised against the legalisation of euthanasia in Denmark, according to a recently released report

16 out of 17 members of the committee have voiced strong opposition to allowing euthanasia in Denmark concluding that “there is too much at stake regarding our basic view of humanity for euthanasia to be introduced in Denmark”.

Only one member of the Council did not fully oppose legalising euthanasia but still voiced caution about the need to adequately regulate any such practice. 

Looking to Oregon and the Netherlands as examples

When evaluating the ethics of legalising euthanasia, the Council looked at the differing practices in the US state of Oregon, and in the Netherlands. After examining the effects of legalised euthanasia in these places, the majority of the Council reflected that “the very presence of an offer of euthanasia risks decisively changing our ideas about old age, the coming of death, quality of life and what it means to take others into account. Once euthanasia becomes an option, the risk that it will affect the view of certain groups in society is too great”.

In the Netherlands, euthanasia was effectively decriminalised by a court decision in 1984, and then by Parliament in 2001. In the first year, 1,882 deaths were recorded. This number increased to 6,938 in 2020 accounting for 4.1% of the total number of deaths in the Netherlands in that year. Doctors are permitted to administer euthanasia to dementia patients without a prior agreement as to the time and manner of administration.

Oregon legalised physician-assisted suicide in 1997 following the passage of the Death with Dignity Act (DWDA) in 1994. This permitted doctors to prescribe lethal drugs for self-administration to mentally competent Oregon residents, above the age of 18, who are suffering terminal illness and are likely to die within six months.

Council President warns euthanasia would “harm far too many”

Leif Vestergaard, President of the Danish Council of Ethics stated that the wider impact of legalising euthanasia goes far beyond individuals who want to end their lives by euthanasia. “Help to die may be the right choice for a few, but harm far too many others”, he argued

His voice of opposition is joined by others who are weighing in on the debate. The trade union for doctors in Denmark has said that “active euthanasia should not be an option”. Helga Schultz, chairperson for the organisation, stated that the medical community should focus on “how we relieve”. 

Brita Jørgensen, chair of the Professional Association for Palliative Care Nurses, also stressed the need for relief of symptoms, pointing out that healthcare professionals need “more resources and knowledge to do so”. 

Call to focus on palliative care

Right To Life UK spokesperson, Catherine Robinson, said “It’s encouraging to see the Danish Council of Ethics payin heed to the disturbing practices of other territories that have legalised euthanasia”. 

“It is all too clear that once euthanasia is legalised, the attitude of society towards its most vulnerable members changes significantly for the worse. The Council’s firm rejection of legalising euthanasia acts as a rallying cry in support of the marginalised and vulnerable members of society”. 

“As the Danish medical bodies have emphasised, we need to focus on providing excellent palliative care rather than legalising euthanasia”.

URGENT
APPEAL
to protect vulnerable lives

Help stop three major anti-life threats.

Help fight major assisted suicide and abortion up to birth threats.

Dear reader,

Despite the Leadbeater assisted-suicide Bill passing its Third Reading on 20 June, it scraped through by just 23 votes (314-291) after enjoying a 55-vote majority at Second Reading. Had 12 more MPs switched sides, the Bill would be dead. It now limps into the Lords with a wafer-thin majority, where peers can amend, delay or reject it outright.

THE CHALLENGE

Dignity in Dying, My Death My Decision and Humanists UK have poured millions into pushing assisted suicide and will fight hard to stop the Lords overturning the Bill.

At the same time, the Antoniazzi abortion-up-to-birth amendment, passed by MPs in June, also heads to the Lords. If it becomes law, it would no longer be illegal for women to perform their own abortions for any reason – including sex-selective purposes – and at any point up to and during birth.

We will be up against the UK’s largest abortion providers, BPAS and MSI Reproductive Choices (formerly Marie Stopes), who are expected to push for even more extreme changes to our abortion laws in the Lords.

WE NEED YOUR HELP

Thousands of vulnerable lives are now at stake. Battling these two threats is the biggest and most expensive effort in our history, and has drained our limited resources. To fight effectively on both fronts, we aim to raise £200,000 by midnight this Sunday (13 July 2025).

Every donation, large or small, will help protect lives, and UK taxpayers can add 25p to every £1 through Gift Aid at no extra cost.

Will you make a donation now to help protect vulnerable lives from these major threats?

URGENT
APPEAL
to protect vulnerable lives

Help stop three major anti-life threats.

Help fight major assisted suicide and abortion up to birth threats.