Select Page

Priest offered euthanasia twice while recovering from hip fracture despite being known to be opposed to it

A Canadian priest has twice been offered an assisted death while recovering from a hip fracture, despite being known to be opposed to euthanasia.

According to reports, the 79-year-old priest, Father Larry Holland from Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, said he was not dying then or now, but that medical professionals raised the prospect of ending his life by euthanasia on more than one occasion.

“I think I was very shocked. It is such a sensitive subject”, he said, describing his reaction when a doctor raised the topic of euthanasia and assisted suicide with him.

The medical professionals’ mention of this topic left him “kind of silent” for a moment. “There are some things you just don’t talk about to some people”, said Holland.

After the Catholic priest explained to the doctor that he was morally opposed to euthanasia, the doctor said “he just wanted to make sure that, if a [terminal] diagnosis came up or not … I knew of the different services I had access to”.

Despite making his views clear, just a few weeks later, the priest was offered euthanasia a second time. The offer came from a nurse whom Holland believed to be uncomfortable raising the topic with him.

A spokesman for Vancouver Coastal Health, which operates the hospital in which Holland was cared for, said “staff may consider bringing up MAID [medical assistance in dying] based on their clinical judgment, provided they possess the necessary knowledge and skills to do so”.

An attack on his identity

The archdiocese’s pro-life chaplain, Father Larry Lynn, said “This must surely be among the most appalling examples of Canada’s coercive and insensitive euthanasia regime”.

Lynn said it was disturbing when a medical professional raises euthanasia with any patient, but it is particularly bad when the patient is explicitly known to be morally opposed to the practice.

Amanda Achtman, founder of the anti-euthanasia project Dying to Meet You, and ethics director of Canadian Physicians for Life, said that medical professionals initiating euthanasia discussions in a medical setting is a form of coercion that attacks patients’ deepest convictions when they are vulnerable. She described it as a form of “torment” for someone who has deeply held beliefs and “an attack on their identity”.

In March 2026, guidance produced by the Canadian Association of MAID Assessors and Providers titled ‘Bringing Up Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) As a Clinical Care Option’, recommended that “great caution” be taken by euthanasia providers in deciding not to raise it with patients who meet the legal criteria. The document warns that medical professionals can make “incorrect assumptions about a patient’s beliefs or preferences – for example, assuming a patient might object because they belong to a faith community, even though some individuals of strong faith have chosen MAiD”.

Spokesperson for Right To Life UK, Catherine Robinson, said “Offering euthanasia to a vulnerable person like Holland, who was known to be opposed to the practice, is an appalling abuse of the relationship between patient and doctor. It is highly coercive, and Achtman is right to say this is an attack on his identity as a priest”.

“Fortunately, the assisted suicide Bill in England and Wales has failed, otherwise we could expect similar occurrences here”.

EMERGENCY
APPEAL
to SAVE
lives

Help stop three major anti-life threats.

Help stop three major anti-life threats.

Dear reader,

Thanks to the hard work and dedication of people like you across the UK, the McArthur assisted suicide Bill in Scotland was defeated in March by 69 votes to 57.

Then, in April, the Leadbeater assisted suicide Bill fell in the House of Lords.

Many commentators thought both Bills would become law.

If that had happened, governments in England, Scotland and Wales would now be preparing to roll out assisted suicide services.

Over the coming decades, this would have led to the deaths of many thousands of vulnerable people.

But that is not what happened.

Because supporters like you acted, those Bills were stopped.

Because of you, many vulnerable lives have been saved.

These were two very significant victories. But sadly, they are not the last battles we face this year.

The new Parliamentary session began on Wednesday. We now face three major threats.

  1. Attempts to bring back the Leadbeater assisted suicide Bill and bypass the House of Lords

    The assisted suicide lobby, led by Dignity in Dying, a multi-million-pound pressure group, has made it clear that it is going to attempt to bring back the Leadbeater assisted suicide Bill in the next parliamentary session.

    It then plans to use the Parliament Acts to bypass the House of Lords and force the Bill into law.

  2. Labour Government plans for a major expansion of abortion provision, including financial incentives for ‘lunch-hour’ abortions

    Under these plans, the Government would financially incentivise major abortion providers, BPAS and MSI Reproductive Choices, to provide ‘lunch-hour’ or ‘same-day’ abortions.

    ‘Lunch-hour’ abortion services are walk-in abortion services designed to fit into a woman’s lunch hour.

    Women facing an unplanned pregnancy need time, care and support, not a system that gives abortion clinics a financial incentive to rush them through consultations, scans and abortions on the same day.

    If these plans go ahead, many more lives are likely to be ended by abortion here in the UK.

  3. Extreme abortion up to birth proposals in Scotland

    In Scotland, plans are moving forward to introduce an extreme abortion up to birth law. This would go far beyond the abortion law change recently backed by the Lords for England and Wales.

    A review of abortion law in Scotland, commissioned by Humza Yousaf when he was Scottish First Minister, recommended that the Scottish Government scrap the current 24-week time limit – and abortion be available on social grounds, including for sex-selective purposes, right up to birth.

    The final plans are expected to be brought forward as a Government Bill in the new Scottish Parliament, which begins this Thursday.

If these three major threats succeed, thousands of vulnerable lives will be lost.

We cannot allow this to happen.

We can only defeat these three major threats with your help.

We ran our biggest campaigns ever to help defeat the assisted suicide Bills at Westminster and in Scotland.

That work has made a serious dent in our limited resources.

To cover this gap and ensure we can effectively defeat these three major threats in the coming months, we are aiming to raise at least £199,250 by midnight this Sunday (17 May 2026).

We are, therefore, appealing to you to please give as generously as you can.

Every donation, large or small, will make a crucial difference in saving the lives of the unborn and many others. Plus, if you are a UK taxpayer, £1 becomes £1.25 with Gift Aid at no extra cost to you.

By stopping these threats, YOU can save lives during this new Parliamentary session.

Will you donate now to help protect vulnerable lives from these three major threats?

EMERGENCY
APPEAL
to SAVE
lives

Help stop three major anti-life threats.

Help stop three major anti-life threats.