Select Page

New study suggests hearing their mother’s voice reduces premature babies’ pain

A new study has found that premature babies appear to experience less pain during medical procedures when they are spoken to by their mothers. Premature babies often have to spend time away from their parents in neonatal intensive care units and may require multiple painful clinical procedures. 

Dr Manuela Filippa, of the University of Geneva—the study’s first author—explained that the new research may not only help the infants, but also the parents by showing them how they can play an important role while their baby is in intensive care.

She said: “We are trying to find non-pharmacological ways to lower the pain in these babies”, she said, adding that there was a growing body of evidence that parental contact with preterm babies could be important for a number of reasons, including attachment.

Dr Filippa said the team focused on voice as it was not always possible for parents to hold their babies, and that voice could be a powerful way of communicating emotion.

Mothers’ voices were studied in particular as infants would already have heard it while in the womb. However, Filippa said that this did not mean a father’s voice would not become as familiar over time, and added that they are currently running a study on fathers’ vocal contacts.

Writing in peer-reviewed journal “Scientific Reports”, Filippa and researchers at the University of Geneva, Parini hospital in Italy and the University of Valle d’Aosta, reported how they monitored the pain responses of 20 premature babies in neonatal intensive care by carrying out a routine procedure in which the child’s foot is pricked and a few drops of blood are collected.

The team looked at the babies’ responses to the procedure on three occasions, each of which was randomly assigned to one of three conditions: the mother speaking to her child, the mother singing to her child, and the mother not being present.

The team recorded three measures to gauge the level of pain experienced by each baby – their facial expressions, heartbeat, and oxygen levels. The facial expressions were subsequently examined by researchers unaware of which condition it was related to.

The results showed that the infants’ pain levels dropped from around 4.5 to 3 on a 21-point scale when their mothers spoke.

Filippa explained: “For this specific age, this is an important change”.

“Oxytocin is known to be involved in the attachment processes and in maternal sensitivity. It can also be protective against the effects of pain”, she went on.

Filippa also explained that pain reduction was less clear when mothers were singing, a finding which may reflect the “constraints of the structure, words, pitch and melody of songs and lullabies”.

One limitation of the study was the small number of babies involved. “Of course we need to have more preterm babies involved and also other measures, neurological measures, for pain perception”, said Filippa.

However, she added that the results were promising, explaining that: “The key message is that it is very important to involve parents in the early care of their preterm infants, also in difficult situations like painful procedures, using their voice… What we know now is that parents can do it and it is beneficial”.

Born before the abortion limit

It is becoming more and more common for babies born before the UK abortion limit to survive. In October 2018 for example, a severely premature baby was born in Scotland almost 2 weeks below the abortion limit. Sofia Viktoria Birina weighed only 500g, but by February last year she was healthy enough to be sent home with her parents.

Baby Sofia is not alone in being born so prematurely and going on to survive. A study, published in the Journal of the American Medical Association in October 2019, followed 2.56 million babies born in Sweden between 1973 and 1997, around six percent of whom were born prematurely.

Researchers compared the health data of the premature babies to those that had been born at full term. They found that 55% of premature babies had no serious chronic, physical, or mental health issues by early adulthood. This is compared to 63% for babies born at full term.

Additionally, with each passing decade, the odds of survival for a premature baby to adulthood have improved from about 91% of babies born in the 1970s to about 96% of those born in the 1990s.

Right To Life UK spokesperson, Catherine Robinson, said: “Research, such as these recent studies, and advances in medical technology are improving the life-chances and quality of life for premature babies all the time. In particular, severely premature births pose a direct challenge to the abortion law in Britain, which permits abortion up to the 24th week of pregnancy”.

URGENT
APPEAL
to protect vulnerable lives

Help stop three major anti-life threats.

Help fight the next phase of our battles against major assisted suicide and abortion up to birth threats.

Dear reader,

We are facing two major threats in the Lords - an extreme assisted suicide Bill and an abortion up to birth amendment.

THE GOOD NEWS - OUR STRATEGY IS WORKING

At Second Reading of the Leadbeater assisted suicide Bill in the House of Lords, a record number of Peers spoke, and of those who took a position, around two-thirds opposed the assisted suicide Bill. That is more than double the number who supported it.

Our side also secured a significant win, with the establishment of a dedicated Lords Select Committee to further scrutinise the Bill’s proposals – and Committee Stage has been delayed until it reports.

This momentum has been built by tens of thousands of people like you. Thanks to your hard work, Peers are receiving a very large number of emails and letters by post, making the case against the Bill. 

Thanks to your support, we have been able to mount a major campaign in Parliament, in the media and online – alongside your own efforts – to keep us on course for our goal: that this dangerous Bill never becomes law.

BUT MORE CHALLENGES LIE AHEAD

We cannot become complacent. Well-funded groups - Dignity in Dying, My Death My Decision and Humanists UK - have poured millions into pushing assisted suicide. They can see support is slipping and will fight hard to reverse that.

This is not the only fight we are facing in the House of Lords.

At the same time, the Antoniazzi abortion up to birth amendment, which passed in the House of Commons in June, is moving through the House of Lords as part of the Crime and Policing Bill.

Second Reading will take place in a matter of weeks. It will then go on to Committee and Report Stages, where we will be up against the UK’s largest abortion providers – BPAS and MSI Reproductive Choices (formerly Marie Stopes) – who are expected to lobby for even more extreme changes to our abortion laws.

If the Antoniazzi amendment becomes law, it would no longer be illegal for women to perform their own abortions for any reason – including sex-selective purposes – at any point up to and during birth.

Thousands of vulnerable lives - at the beginning and the end of life - depend on what happens next. We must do everything in our power to stop these radical proposals.

WE NEED YOUR HELP

Our campaign against the Leadbeater Bill in the House of Lords is working, but the work we have already done has significantly stretched our limited resources.

We are now stepping up our efforts against the assisted suicide Bill while launching a major push to stop the abortion up to birth amendment in the Lords. 

To fight effectively on both fronts, we aim to raise £183,750 by midnight this Sunday (5 October 2025).

Every donation, large or small, will help protect lives, and UK taxpayers can add 25p to every £1 through Gift Aid at no extra cost.

Will you donate now to help protect vulnerable lives from these two major threats?

URGENT
APPEAL
to protect vulnerable lives

Help stop three major anti-life threats.

Help fight the next phase of our battles against major assisted suicide and abortion up to birth threats.