Select Page

Midwifery student wins apology and settlement from University after facing suspension for being pro-life

A midwifery student,  who faced suspension from her studies due toher involvement in the university pro-life society, has won an apology and payout from her university.

Julia Rynkiewicz, 25, faced suspension from the University of Nottingham and a four-month-long fitness-to-practice investigation in 2019 as a result of lecturers raising concerns about her being pro-life.

In January of this year, university officials U-turned on their decision and dismissed the case against her. Julia asked for an apology “as a matter of justice” so that “they realise they have done wrong and will change it so that no one else has to go through what I have”.

After a formal complaint was filed, the university has now conceded a settlement and apology.

Putting my life on hold

Julia said: “Putting my life on hold because of an unjust investigation was really difficult, both mentally and emotionally”.

“The settlement demonstrates that the university’s treatment of me was wrong, and while I’m happy to move on, I hope this means that no other student will have to experience what I have”.

“What happened to me risks creating a fear among students to discuss their values and beliefs, but university should be the place where you are invited to do just that”.

A University of Nottingham spokesperson said: “While all universities take fitness-to-practice considerations extremely seriously, the university has offered an apology and settlement to Ms Rynkiewicz and is considering how we might approach such cases differently in future”.

“The university and Students’ Union supports the rights of all students to bodily autonomy and access to safe, legal abortion services, which is the position in law”.

“Universities should be spaces to debate, discuss and disagree points of view, and with more than 200 student societies, covering the full range of beliefs and perspectives, we are confident this is the case at Nottingham”.

Pattern of discrimination

Julia had served as president of the student pro-life group, Nottingham Students for Life (NSFL), which itself was initially denied affiliation to the Students’ Union. This viewpoint discrimination only ended after NSFL threatened legal action and the decision was overturned in July 2019.

One of the chief concerns surrounding her fitness-to-practice investigation was Julia’s public involvement with NSFL.

The University of Nottingham is not alone in this kind of viewpoint discrimination. In the last three years, student representative bodies at Aberdeen University, Glasgow University and Strathclyde University have all tried to prevent student pro-life groups from being affiliated with their university and benefiting from the same privileges available to any other student group. In each of these cases, the student unions had to reverse their decision after the groups threatened legal proceedings against them. Pro-life students at the University of Birmingham also faced significant opposition in the formation of their group.

Spokesperson for Right To Life UK, Catherine Robinson, said: “It’s good to see the university admitting its wrongdoing. The fact that this happened at all though, is a strong indication that the university does not take its commitment to debate and discussion seriously”.

“Worryingly, 38% of students fear their future careers would be adversely affected if they express their true opinions. So long as universities continue to discriminate against mainstream views, pro-life and others, debate and discussion will continue to be stifled and students will increasingly fear reprisals from their university”.

Dear reader,

On Friday 11 September, MPs will vote on the revived assisted suicide Bill.

Only 12 MPs need to change their minds and switch from voting yes to no for the new assisted suicide Bill to be defeated. This is a vote we can win – but MPs need to hear from their constituents now.

The Prime Minister, Andy Burnham, has delivered a major setback to the assisted suicide lobby. He has said that palliative and social care funding should be fixed before Parliament considers assisted suicide.

This marks a significant change from his predecessor, Keir Starmer, who publicly backed and voted for the previous assisted suicide Bill.

His intervention creates a real opportunity to persuade MPs who supported the previous Bill to reconsider.

Even if you have contacted your MP before, please email them again. This is a new Bill and a new vote. Whether they supported or opposed the previous Bill, the result could be extremely close, and they need to hear from you before 11 September.

We have launched a simple tool which makes it easy to contact your MP to ask them to vote NO on 11 September. It takes only 30 seconds to send your email.

Please take action now and click the button below to contact your MP.