Select Page

Labour loses all seats in council containing assisted suicide Bill sponsor Kim Leadbeater’s parliamentary constituency

In the borough containing Kim Leadbeater’s Spen Valley constituency, Labour lost every single council seat it held in last week’s local election, only weeks after the historic collapse of the Labour MP’s assisted suicide Bill.

Across the elections on 7 May for Kirklees District Council, which entirely contains Kim Leadbeater’s Spen Valley parliamentary constituency, the Labour Party did not win a single seat. The Party went from being the largest party on the council before the election, with 23 seats, to now not having a single seat on the entire council. 

Electoral Calculus, which predicts outcomes for elections, now predicts that Kim Leadbeater MP will lose her seat at the next general election, with Reform UK having a 46% chance of winning, at the time of writing.

Labour suffers historic election losses following failure of controversial assisted suicide Bill

The loss of all Labour seats within Kirklees District Council and the losses experienced by the Labour Party following the elections that took place on 7 May 2026, come only weeks after the failure of the assisted suicide Bill in the House of Lords. 

The Labour Party lost 1,496 council seats in England. In Scotland, the Party lost four seats. In Wales, Labour lost a total of 35 seats in the Senedd.

These dramatic changes come amid party divisions relating to the assisted suicide Bill. 224 of the 314 votes in favour of the Bill came from Labour MPs, while 160 Labour MPs voted against the Bill at Third reading last year, and the Cabinet is known to be divided on the issue. 

MPs turn against assisted suicide Bill

Despite the Leadbeater assisted suicide Bill passing its Third Reading in the House of Commons on 20 June 2025, it scraped through by just 23 votes (314–291), a significant reduction in support after passing its Second Reading with a 55-vote majority. This collapse in support for the Bill was the largest proportional drop between those two stages in more than 160 years.

Now, polling has suggested that more MPs would oppose the assisted suicide Bill than could be relied upon to back it if the Bill were revived in the next parliamentary session.

The polling, which was carried out by Whitestone Insight, found that only 41% of MPs surveyed can now definitely be relied upon to vote “Aye” again, while 45% said they would continue to vote no, suggesting that if the legislation were to be put to a vote today, it would likely be rejected by the House of Commons.

Only 12 MPs need to change from supporting the previous Bill to opposing the new Bill for the new Bill to fail, so the poll suggests that any MP considering bringing back the assisted suicide Bill after the King’s Speech would likely be destined to fail.

Spokesperson for Right To Life UK, Catherine Robinson, said “It seems from the results of the elections, particularly those in the Kirklees area, where Kim Leadbeater is many people’s MP, that assisted suicide is not a vote-winner. In fact, it would appear that it is actually a vote-loser”.

“The assisted suicide Bill’s stint in Parliament was completely farcical, and only exacerbated the deep divisions that exist within the Labour Party. If the Party wants to have any chance of success at the next General Election – or if it wishes to ameliorate its losses – its MPs should not attempt to bring back the assisted suicide Bill in the next session of Parliament”.

“The public clearly doesn’t want it, and polling suggests that MPs would not support it, either. It is time to let the Bill die a permanent death”.

​​Dear reader,

You may be surprised to learn that our 24-week abortion time limit is out of line with the majority of European Union countries, where the most common time limit for abortion on demand or on broad social grounds is 12 weeks gestation.

The latest guidance from the British Association of Perinatal Medicine enables doctors to intervene to save premature babies from 22 weeks. The latest research indicates that a significant number of babies born at 22 weeks gestation can survive outside the womb, and this number increases with proactive perinatal care.

This leaves a real contradiction in British law. In one room of a hospital, doctors could be working to save a baby born alive at 23 weeks whilst, in another room of that same hospital, a doctor could perform an abortion that would end the life of a baby at the same age.

The majority of the British population support reducing the time limit. Polling has shown that 70% of British women favour a reduction in the time limit from 24 weeks to 20 weeks or below.

Please click the button below to sign the petition to the Prime Minister, asking him to do everything in his power to reduce the abortion time limit.