Select Page

Hospice boss warns patients may feel forced to choose fully funded assisted suicide over cash-strapped palliative care

A senior palliative care boss has warned that patients could be pushed towards an assisted death if assisted suicide services end up better funded than hospices.

Following the Third Reading of the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill, Toby Porter, the chief executive of Hospice UK, which represents more than 200 hospices, said Keir Starmer’s insistence that he would find the money to fund an assisted suicide service could leave hospices underfunded and this would be a “betrayal of the population”.

Porter, who gave evidence to the assisted suicide Bill Committee in January, said “You could very easily see that everybody’s energy goes into [assisted suicide] over the next few years”.

The Government’s impact assessment estimated that the number of people opting for an assisted death was likely to be under 1 per cent based on comparable jurisdictions.

“It would be very quixotic if all our energies went into how this 1 per cent will die and making sure they have the choice that they want and the MPs have perfectly correctly decided they should have, but we did nothing about the all of the choices that should exist within palliative care, for the 99 per cent, if you like”.

“You can’t but note a moral question mark over the assumption we all make – until we hear otherwise – that an assisted dying service will be fully state funded, whereas currently the palliative care provided by hospices is currently only 30 per cent state funded and 70 per cent funded by charity”.

“If palliative care gets no investment and all of the attention goes in [to assisted suicide] that will mean the needs of the 1 per cent will be prioritised over the needs of the 99 per cent”.

A moral and practical disgrace

Porter previously raised similar concerns when giving evidence to the assisted suicide Bill Committee. He said “an outcome in which someone chose an assisted death because of a real or imagined fear that they could not get pain relief or other symptom alleviation, or because their family would not get support through their illness, would clearly be a moral and practical disgrace for any country”.

Earlier this year, Parliament was accused of granting a “blank cheque” for Kim Leadbeater’s assisted suicide Bill amid an outcry from MPs concerned about cost implications in an underfunded palliative care sector.

In January, as part of the process for passing a bill, MPs had to agree on a ‘money resolution‘ for Leadbeater’s Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill before it could move on to Committee Stage.

The resolution said that – for any Act that might result from the Bill – “it is expedient to authorise the payment out of money provided by Parliament of any expenditure incurred under or by virtue of the Act by the Secretary of State, and any increase attributable to the Act in the sums payable under or by virtue of any other Act of money so provided”.

Sir John Hayes MP focused on the vague wording of the resolution saying Kim Leadbeater “says that this is not a blank cheque, but you can’t get much more blank than that can you? Essentially, any monies associated with the Bill—if it becomes an Act—will be provided”.

“[W]e have to ask the question”, he went on, “where will that money come from? Presumably it can come only from existing resource, and one assumes palliative care”.

Spokesperson for Right To Life UK, Catherine Robinson, said “The apparent commitment to fund a state assisted suicide service and the lack of any corresponding commitment to ensure full state funding for palliative care, risks creating a perverse push towards assisted suicide since one service could be readily available while the other is not”.

“For vulnerable people near the end of their lives, it is especially concerning that assisted suicide could end up becoming the default, simply because it is available and better funded than palliative care”.

URGENT
APPEAL
to protect vulnerable lives

Help stop three major anti-life threats.

Help fight the next phase of our battles against major assisted suicide and abortion up to birth threats.

Dear reader,

We are facing two major threats in the Lords - an extreme assisted suicide Bill and an abortion up to birth amendment.

THE GOOD NEWS - OUR STRATEGY IS WORKING

At Second Reading of the Leadbeater assisted suicide Bill in the House of Lords, a record number of Peers spoke, and of those who took a position, around two-thirds opposed the assisted suicide Bill. That is more than double the number who supported it.

Our side also secured a significant win, with the establishment of a dedicated Lords Select Committee to further scrutinise the Bill’s proposals – and Committee Stage has been delayed until it reports.

This momentum has been built by tens of thousands of people like you. Thanks to your hard work, Peers are receiving a very large number of emails and letters by post, making the case against the Bill. 

Thanks to your support, we have been able to mount a major campaign in Parliament, in the media and online – alongside your own efforts – to keep us on course for our goal: that this dangerous Bill never becomes law.

BUT MORE CHALLENGES LIE AHEAD

We cannot become complacent. Well-funded groups - Dignity in Dying, My Death My Decision and Humanists UK - have poured millions into pushing assisted suicide. They can see support is slipping and will fight hard to reverse that.

This is not the only fight we are facing in the House of Lords.

At the same time, the Antoniazzi abortion up to birth amendment, which passed in the House of Commons in June, is moving through the House of Lords as part of the Crime and Policing Bill.

Second Reading will take place in a matter of weeks. It will then go on to Committee and Report Stages, where we will be up against the UK’s largest abortion providers – BPAS and MSI Reproductive Choices (formerly Marie Stopes) – who are expected to lobby for even more extreme changes to our abortion laws.

If the Antoniazzi amendment becomes law, it would no longer be illegal for women to perform their own abortions for any reason – including sex-selective purposes – at any point up to and during birth.

Thousands of vulnerable lives - at the beginning and the end of life - depend on what happens next. We must do everything in our power to stop these radical proposals.

WE NEED YOUR HELP

Our campaign against the Leadbeater Bill in the House of Lords is working, but the work we have already done has significantly stretched our limited resources.

We are now stepping up our efforts against the assisted suicide Bill while launching a major push to stop the abortion up to birth amendment in the Lords. 

To fight effectively on both fronts, we aim to raise £183,750 by midnight this Sunday (5 October 2025).

Every donation, large or small, will help protect lives, and UK taxpayers can add 25p to every £1 through Gift Aid at no extra cost.

Will you donate now to help protect vulnerable lives from these two major threats?

URGENT
APPEAL
to protect vulnerable lives

Help stop three major anti-life threats.

Help fight the next phase of our battles against major assisted suicide and abortion up to birth threats.