Select Page

Doctor grants euthanasia for anorexia patients

Eating disorders such as anorexia are accepted as potential criteria for euthanasia on the grounds of terminal or mental illness. 

Anorexia as grounds for euthanasia

In a recent long-form piece for The Guardian, journalist Carrie Arnold speaks to Jennifer Guadiani, a doctor from Denver who specialises in eating disorders. Dr Guadiani co-authored a scientific paper last year in which she defined for the first time “terminal anorexia nervosa”. 

One of the conclusions of the paper is that “these patients deserve … medical aid in dying in jurisdictions where such care is legal”. 

If Guadiani’s definition becomes consensus in the medical community, anorexia would qualify as a terminal illness and would indeed meet the criteria for euthanasia and assisted suicide in a number of jurisdictions. The Denver doctor admits in the interview to helping two patients with anorexia die by euthanasia.

“They’re sick, but they’re not irreparably broken”

Dr Philip Mehler, CEO of Acute, a centre for eating disorders and malnutrition, is firmly opposed to euthanasia for patients with eating disorders. Speaking of patients with anorexia nervosa he says “They’re sick, but they’re not irreparably broken”. 

Responding directly to Dr Guadiani’s article, Dr Mehler categorically rejects her arguments and conclusions, and adamantly asserts that the condition is reversible and therefore cannot be considered terminal. He expresses further concern about the criteria used to define anorexia nervosa as a terminal illness, arguing that the patients whose lives Dr Guadiani ended by euthanasia do not even meet her own criteria for terminal illness. 

The mental capacity of psychiatric patients

As wel as receiving “pointed condemnation” from colleagues, Dr Guadiani’s article also raised questions about the mental capacity of patients facing one of the deadliest psychiatric illnesses. 

Those in favour of euthanasia advocate that it should be for competent individuals who have freely chosen to ask for help to end their lives. For patients with psychiatric disorders, the challenging question arises of whether they have the capacity to make such decisions. 

Decision-making and brain development

Such questions have arisen in Canada as it investigates whether to legalise assisted suicide and euthanasia for children. 

In a recent session providing oral evidence to the Canadian Special Joint Committee on Medical Assistance in Dying, Dr Maria Alisha Montes, Clinical Associate Professor of Paediatrics, spoke about mental capacity in relation to under 18s being offered euthanasia.She explained that “Studies show that the frontal lobe is not fully developed until early adulthood. The frontal lobe is very important for coordinating executive functions, including the balancing of risks and rewards and decision-making.”

“I would argue that MAID for mature minors carries the highest amount of risk, as the consequence is death. It’s irreversible. We need to ask ourselves if we should be legalizing this for mature minors when biology shows us that the ability to balance risks and rewards is one of the last areas of the brain to mature”.

Similarly, studies of patients with anorexia nervosa show that patients’ brains can be significantly altered by the disease. It is not clear how this impacts a patient’s capacity to make decisions when they have a “starved brain”. 

Canadian patients with anorexia waiting for law change

Canada is due to legalise assisted suicide and euthanasia on mental health grounds in March 2024. Reports are emerging of patients with eating disorders awaiting this change in the law so that they can end their lives. Lisa Pauli, 47, is one such patient. “Every day is hell”, she said. “I’m so tired. I’m done. I’ve tried everything. I feel like I’ve lived my life”. 

Right To Like UK spokesperson Catherine Robinson said “It is heartbreaking to read about the suffering of patients with eating disorders and the challenges that they and their families face to receive the support that they need”. 

“Euthanasia is never a medical solution. It does not rid a person of a disease, but rather rids the world of a person. Every person has value and this value deserves to be protected in the law”. 

“Patients with psychiatric disorders need to be supported to access the care that they need. Euthanasia can never be considered care”. 

URGENT
APPEAL
to protect vulnerable lives

Help stop three major anti-life threats.

Help fight the next phase of our battles against major assisted suicide and abortion up to birth threats.

Dear reader,

We are facing two major threats in the Lords - an extreme assisted suicide Bill and an abortion up to birth amendment.

THE GOOD NEWS - OUR STRATEGY IS WORKING

At Second Reading of the Leadbeater assisted suicide Bill in the House of Lords, a record number of Peers spoke, and of those who took a position, around two-thirds opposed the assisted suicide Bill. That is more than double the number who supported it.

Our side also secured a significant win, with the establishment of a dedicated Lords Select Committee to further scrutinise the Bill’s proposals – and Committee Stage has been delayed until it reports.

This momentum has been built by tens of thousands of people like you. Thanks to your hard work, Peers are receiving a very large number of emails and letters by post, making the case against the Bill. 

Thanks to your support, we have been able to mount a major campaign in Parliament, in the media and online – alongside your own efforts – to keep us on course for our goal: that this dangerous Bill never becomes law.

BUT MORE CHALLENGES LIE AHEAD

We cannot become complacent. Well-funded groups - Dignity in Dying, My Death My Decision and Humanists UK - have poured millions into pushing assisted suicide. They can see support is slipping and will fight hard to reverse that.

This is not the only fight we are facing in the House of Lords.

At the same time, the Antoniazzi abortion up to birth amendment, which passed in the House of Commons in June, is moving through the House of Lords as part of the Crime and Policing Bill.

Second Reading will take place in a matter of weeks. It will then go on to Committee and Report Stages, where we will be up against the UK’s largest abortion providers – BPAS and MSI Reproductive Choices (formerly Marie Stopes) – who are expected to lobby for even more extreme changes to our abortion laws.

If the Antoniazzi amendment becomes law, it would no longer be illegal for women to perform their own abortions for any reason – including sex-selective purposes – at any point up to and during birth.

Thousands of vulnerable lives - at the beginning and the end of life - depend on what happens next. We must do everything in our power to stop these radical proposals.

WE NEED YOUR HELP

Our campaign against the Leadbeater Bill in the House of Lords is working, but the work we have already done has significantly stretched our limited resources.

We are now stepping up our efforts against the assisted suicide Bill while launching a major push to stop the abortion up to birth amendment in the Lords. 

To fight effectively on both fronts, we aim to raise £183,750 by midnight this Sunday (5 October 2025).

Every donation, large or small, will help protect lives, and UK taxpayers can add 25p to every £1 through Gift Aid at no extra cost.

Will you donate now to help protect vulnerable lives from these two major threats?

URGENT
APPEAL
to protect vulnerable lives

Help stop three major anti-life threats.

Help fight the next phase of our battles against major assisted suicide and abortion up to birth threats.