Select Page

Case dismissed against doctor who provided support to women

An NHS doctor who prescribed the hormone progesterone to women who had taken the first abortion pill in a medical abortion but then changed their mind about going ahead with an abortion is no longer under investigation by the General Medical Council (GMC) after they dismissed “hearsay” evidence from an abortion provider and no complaints were made by the women he treated.

Dr Dermot Kearney was banned for 18 months in May 2021 by the doctor’s regulator, the GMC, from providing progesterone to women who had begun the medical abortion process. During a medical abortion, two pills are taken separately to induce the abortion. The progesterone that Dr Kearney provided was taken after the first pill to attempt to reverse its effects.

Over the course of 12 months, the doctor had provided hormone treatment in an attempt to reverse the effects of the first abortion-inducing pill, mifepristone, to 65 women who had initially tried to have an abortion.

In each case, mothers who had decided to have an abortion for various reasons came to regret their decision after taking the first of two abortion pills. Searching online, they came across Dr Kearney who was prescribing the natural hormone progesterone, which occurs in the body and supports pregnancy. Of the 65 women who underwent the full course of hormone treatment from Dr Kearney and Consultant Obstetrician, Dr Eileen Reilly, 32 gave birth to their babies.

However, Dr Kearney had been prevented from providing this treatment after a complaint by Dr Jonathan Lord, director of abortion provider MSI Reproductive Choices (formerly Marie Stopes International). Dr Lord’s complaint, now described as “hearsay” by the GMC, focused on the supposed lack of evidence for the effectiveness of the treatment that Dr Kearney was offering and alleged that Dr Kearney was not impartial in his advice.

Expert evidence

Expert evidence outlined in the GMC’s examiners’ report stated that: “there was no evidence to suggest that APR increases the risk of harm to a foetus”.

In regards to the risks to women taking the treatment, the evidence outlined: “there was limited randomised controlled trial evidence to suggest that APR increases risk of haemorrhage, but this is more likely to be related to the generic risks of Early Medical Abortion (EMA) rather than to specific risks of APR treatment, ie women who fail to complete EMA are at much higher risk of haemorrhage compared with those who do, irrespective of whether they are prescribed APR or not”.

The GMC has “decided to conclude this case with no further action”.

After ten women provided witness statements in support of Dr Kearney and not a single one of the women he helped complained, the GMC chose to dismiss the case saying: “The case examiners have considered the information provided by MSI Reproductive Choices, openDemocracy, Safe Abortion Action Fund UK and the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists and decided to conclude this case with no further action”.

In witness statements to the GMC, one woman said: “He was amazing. He was not at all judgmental. He was very professional… He was not trying to sell me something I did not want. He told me how he could help me. He was not at all pushy…”

The GMC concurred with this assessment saying that he left women “well informed about the treatment, was not judgemental, did not attempt to push his own views on them, and was overall considered to have been highly supportive”.

Dr Kearney said: “I am relieved and delighted to have been exonerated. I have been the victim of a coordinated campaign by senior figures in the abortion industry who have been determined to prevent women in urgent need from accessing abortion reversal treatment”.

“At all times my concern and priority has been the women who have been referred to me for urgent medical support. I am humbled by the support they have shown me in return”.

“The truth about abortion reversal treatment must now be told and medical professionals who are able and willing to support women with the treatment should be allowed to do so without fear”.

Dr Kearney has “not done anything wrong”.

Amrita Kaur, a 26-year-old model from Lemington Spa, had fallen pregnant and taken the first of two medical abortion pills under pressure from her friends.

“I did it in a moment of anger and upset” she said.

Instantly regretting swallowing the pill, she found Dr Kearney on the internet.

“He was very understanding, telling me “There’s a route we can take”. So I took the progesterone pills and I’ve never looked back. I adore my daughter”.

Her daughter, Ahri-Storm is now four months old, and Amrita is adamant that Dr Kearney has “not done anything wrong”.

“This treatment should be available to those who need it and want it”, she said.

Dr Kearney hopes “that woman across the UK will now be told by medical regulators and abortion providers that abortion reversal treatment is safe, that it is available, and that success is possible if they regret their decision to have an abortion and choose to seek help”.

Andrea Williams, chief executive of the Christian Legal Centre, which supported Dr Kearney during the investigation, said: “We are delighted that justice has been served for this brilliant and compassionate doctor. We are, however, deeply concerned that a case was brought against him in the first place and how it was engineered by Jonathan Lord, a director at MSI Reproductive Choices”.

“It is really sad to think of the many women who have been prevented from receiving life-saving treatment since this ban was in place. No woman should be prevented from changing their mind and seeking to save the life of her child”.

“The mantra of the abortion lobby of “my body my choice” should extend to a woman changing her mind about going through with an abortion. The abortion industry does not want to give women that choice”.

The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has recommended that women who experience bleeding in early pregnancy and have had at least one miscarriage use progesterone.

NICE’s chief executive, Professor Gillian Leng, said that progesterone is: “of benefit to some women, and as an inexpensive treatment option, can be made available to women on the NHS from today”.

Right To Life UK spokesperson, Catherine Robinson, said: “This is wonderful news. Thank you to Dr Dermot Kearney for your courageous commitment to helping women and their unborn children in spite of a concerted campaign from abortion lobbyists to have you struck off. You are an inspiration to us all”.

URGENT
APPEAL
to protect vulnerable lives

Help stop three major anti-life threats.

Only hours left of the appeal to help fight the five major battles we will face in 2026.

Dear reader,

Thanks to the support from people like you, in 2025, we have grown to 250,000 supporters, reached over 100 million views online, helped bring the Leadbeater assisted suicide Bill within just 12 votes of defeat and fought major proposals to introduce abortion up to birth.

However, the challenges we face are far from over.

FIVE MAJOR BATTLES

In 2026, we will be facing five major battles:

  1. Assisted suicide at Westminster – the Leadbeater Bill
    With this session of the UK Parliament at Westminster expected to continue well into 2026, there are many more months of this battle to fight. There is growing momentum in the House of Lords against the dangerous Leadbeater assisted suicide Bill, but well-funded groups such as Dignity in Dying have poured millions into lobbying, and we must sustain the pressure so this Bill never becomes law.
  2. Assisted suicide in Scotland – the McArthur Bill
    We are expecting to face the final Stage 3 vote on the Scottish McArthur assisted suicide Bill early in the new year. If just seven MSPs switch from voting for to against the Bill, it will be defeated. This is a battle that can be won, but the assisted suicide lobby is working intensely to stop that from happening.
  3. Assisted suicide in Wales – the Senedd vote
    In January, we are expecting the Welsh Senedd to vote on whether they will allow the Leadbeater assisted suicide Bill to be rolled out in Wales. Dignity in Dying and their allies are already putting a big focus on winning this vote. This is going to be another decisive and major battle.
  4. Abortion up to birth at Westminster
    We are going to face major battles over the Antoniazzi abortion up to birth amendment as it moves through the House of Lords. Baroness Monckton has tabled an amendment to overturn this change, and other Peers have proposed changes that would protect more babies from having their lives ended in late-term home abortions.
  5. Abortion up to birth in Scotland
    In Scotland, moves are underway to attempt to introduce an even more extreme abortion law there. An “expert group” undertaking a review of abortion law in Scotland has recommended that the Scottish Government scrap the current 24-week time limit – and abortion be available on social grounds right up to birth. It is expected that the Scottish Government will bring forward final proposals as a Government Bill next year.

If these major threats from our opposition are successful, it would be a disaster. Thousands of lives would be lost.

WE CAN ONLY DEFEAT THESE FIVE MAJOR THREATS WITH YOUR HELP

Work fighting both the abortion and assisted suicide lobbies in 2025 has substantially drained our limited resources.

To cover this gap and ensure we effectively fight these battles in the year ahead, our goal is to raise at least £198,750 by midnight this Sunday, 7 December 2025.

With a number of these battles due to begin within weeks, we need funds in place now so we can move immediately.

£198,750 is the minimum we need; anything extra lets us do even more.

If you are able, please give as generously as you can today. Every donation, large or small, will make a real difference. Plus, if you are a UK taxpayer, Gift Aid adds 25p to every £1 you donate at no extra cost to you.

Will you donate now to help protect vulnerable lives from these five major threats?

URGENT
APPEAL
to protect vulnerable lives

Help stop three major anti-life threats.

Only hours left of the appeal to help fight the five major battles we will face in 2026.

URGENT
APPEAL
to protect vulnerable lives

Help stop three major anti-life threats.

Only hours left of the appeal to help fight the five major battles we will face in 2026.