Select Page

Slovakia: Pro-life law change lost by just one vote

A new law, which sought to extend the waiting period before a woman can get an abortion, was rejected in the Slovakian parliament.

The bill lost by one vote, with 67 of the 134 lawmakers present voting in favour of it.

The law, introduced by members of parliament from the Ordinary People and Independent Personalities (OĽaNO) movement, led by Anna Záborská, in addition to extending the waiting period, also intended to offer further financial support to new mothers.

The draft text of the proposed law as written intended to increase the waiting period from 48 to 96 hours “unless there is an immediate threat to women’s health”. However, according to local media, Záborská changed her proposition to a waiting period of 72 hours.

“It’s not only about the mother choosing for her child’s life, but also about helping the mother to carry this decision”.

Introduced at the National Council of the Slovak Republic on 31 August, the law would have also banned the advertising of abortions.

Writing on her Facebook page ahead of the debate on 5 November, Záborská said: “A responsible decision is a decision based on facts. This is also what our bill brings”. 

“Within a year, women will receive from the doctor not only information of a medical nature, but also what social, financial, psychological support they can receive if they deliver their child”.

“It’s not only about the mother choosing for her child’s life, but also about helping the mother to carry this decision”.

Abortion is legal in Slovakia on demand up until 12 weeks of pregnancy and later if the life of the baby’s mother is thought to be in danger.

Abortion waiting times reduce the abortion rate

Last week it was revealed that 1,480 women in Ireland did not go through with their abortion after an initial consultation and a three-day waiting period. Research also suggests that waiting periods that require women to make two physical visits to an abortion provider lead to a reduction in the overall abortion rate by as much as 8.9%.

Polling in the UK indicates that the public is strongly in favour of introducing a ‘waiting period’ between an initial consultation and an abortion taking place in order to ensure that a mother has enough time to consider all the options available to her, with 79% of those surveyed in agreement with such a proposal.

Right To Like UK spokesperson, Catherine Robinson, said: “Záborská seems to have recognised what research overseas has shown  – waiting periods between initial consultation and abortion can help decrease the overall abortion rate. This can only be a good thing, which should have widespread support”.

URGENT
APPEAL
to protect vulnerable lives

Help stop three major anti-life threats.

Help fight the next phase of our battles against major assisted suicide and abortion up to birth threats.

Dear reader,

We are facing two major threats in the Lords - an extreme assisted suicide Bill and an abortion up to birth amendment.

THE GOOD NEWS - OUR STRATEGY IS WORKING

At Second Reading of the Leadbeater assisted suicide Bill in the House of Lords, a record number of Peers spoke, and of those who took a position, around two-thirds opposed the assisted suicide Bill. That is more than double the number who supported it.

Our side also secured a significant win, with the establishment of a dedicated Lords Select Committee to further scrutinise the Bill’s proposals – and Committee Stage has been delayed until it reports.

This momentum has been built by tens of thousands of people like you. Thanks to your hard work, Peers are receiving a very large number of emails and letters by post, making the case against the Bill. 

Thanks to your support, we have been able to mount a major campaign in Parliament, in the media and online – alongside your own efforts – to keep us on course for our goal: that this dangerous Bill never becomes law.

BUT MORE CHALLENGES LIE AHEAD

We cannot become complacent. Well-funded groups - Dignity in Dying, My Death My Decision and Humanists UK - have poured millions into pushing assisted suicide. They can see support is slipping and will fight hard to reverse that.

This is not the only fight we are facing in the House of Lords.

At the same time, the Antoniazzi abortion up to birth amendment, which passed in the House of Commons in June, is moving through the House of Lords as part of the Crime and Policing Bill.

Second Reading will take place in a matter of weeks. It will then go on to Committee and Report Stages, where we will be up against the UK’s largest abortion providers – BPAS and MSI Reproductive Choices (formerly Marie Stopes) – who are expected to lobby for even more extreme changes to our abortion laws.

If the Antoniazzi amendment becomes law, it would no longer be illegal for women to perform their own abortions for any reason – including sex-selective purposes – at any point up to and during birth.

Thousands of vulnerable lives - at the beginning and the end of life - depend on what happens next. We must do everything in our power to stop these radical proposals.

WE NEED YOUR HELP

Our campaign against the Leadbeater Bill in the House of Lords is working, but the work we have already done has significantly stretched our limited resources.

We are now stepping up our efforts against the assisted suicide Bill while launching a major push to stop the abortion up to birth amendment in the Lords. 

To fight effectively on both fronts, we aim to raise £183,750 by midnight this Sunday (5 October 2025).

Every donation, large or small, will help protect lives, and UK taxpayers can add 25p to every £1 through Gift Aid at no extra cost.

Will you donate now to help protect vulnerable lives from these two major threats?

URGENT
APPEAL
to protect vulnerable lives

Help stop three major anti-life threats.

Help fight the next phase of our battles against major assisted suicide and abortion up to birth threats.