Select Page

Pro-life volunteer arrested for silent prayer again

The day before MPs vote on whether to introduce nationwide censorship zones, a woman has been arrested for praying silently outside a closed abortion clinic just three weeks after she was acquitted on similar charges.

Isabel Vaughan-Spruce, a pro-life volunteer, was arrested in December for allegedly breaching a Public Space Protection Order (PSPO), which bans protests outside abortion clinics within a designated area.

Vaughan-Spruce, alongside a priest, Fr Sean Gough, who was separately charged for holding a sign reading “Praying for freedom of speech” outside an abortion clinic within a PSPO, were both acquitted on the grounds that there was not enough evidence and that their prosecution would not be in the public interest.

However, yesterday, Vaughan-Spruce was arrested again by West Midlands Police for the same alleged violation of the PSPO. In a video posted online by the legal group ADF UK, a police officer asks Vaughan-Spruce, who is standing still with her hands in her pockets, if she will move outside the PSPO.

In response, Vaughan-Spruce says “But I’m not protesting. I’m not engaging in any of the activities that are prohibited…”

To which the officer replies “But you’ve said you’re engaging in prayer, which is the offence.”

She then tells the officer that it is silent prayer, which he says is “still an offence.”

Silent prayer is an “offence”

In a separate video of the same event released by ADF UK, the officer tells Vaughan-Spruce that the PSPO says that she should not be here. Vaughan-Spruce however says “No, it says not to protest. I’m not protesting.”

“But people know who you are”, the officer replies, “and they know why you are here… and it’s their perception of events, isn’t it?”

Vaughan-Spruce again says she is silently praying to which the officer again replies “OK, and it’s their perception of events which is that you’re protesting.”

Vaughan-Spruce was subsequently arrested.

MPs to decide if they want to introduce thought crime

ADF UK  said “Police wrongly claimed that the PSPO ‘buffer zone’ banned Isabel from simply standing near a clinic.”

“This is simply not true. A court ruled only weeks ago that Isabel broke no laws by thinking a prayer in her mind.”

Vaughan-Spruce’s arrest comes as MPs are voting on a law to introduce censorship zones that will likely criminalise certain thoughts outside of abortion clinics across England and Wales. The proposed law has been heavily criticised for being unclear about whether it criminalises silent prayer and consensual discussion or not. Andrew Lewer MP has proposed an amendment to the law that ensures that consensual discussion and silent prayer are not criminal.

Writing in the Daily Express, Mr Lewer said “We do not need ‘thoughtcrime’ introduced in the United Kingdom.”

After the arrest of Vaughan-Spruce just weeks after her acquittal, ADF UK asked “How can MPs roll out this law with so little clarity?”

Right To Life UK spokesperson Catherine Robinson said “Not only is Isabel’s arrest an outrage, the PSPO, which may or may not ban silent prayer, is an extremely poorly written law. Just three weeks ago, Isabel and Fr Sean Gough were acquitted for the same charge that Isabel is facing once again.”

“There is so little clarity at the local level. It makes no sense for MPs to introduce the same confusion at the national level.”

Dear reader,

You may be surprised to learn that our 24-week abortion time limit is out of line with the majority of European Union countries, where the most common time limit for abortion on demand or on broad social grounds is 12 weeks gestation.

The latest guidance from the British Association of Perinatal Medicine enables doctors to intervene to save premature babies from 22 weeks. The latest research indicates that a significant number of babies born at 22 weeks gestation can survive outside the womb, and this number increases with proactive perinatal care.

This leaves a real contradiction in British law. In one room of a hospital, doctors could be working to save a baby born alive at 23 weeks whilst, in another room of that same hospital, a doctor could perform an abortion that would end the life of a baby at the same age.

The majority of the British population support reducing the time limit. Polling has shown that 70% of British women favour a reduction in the time limit from 24 weeks to 20 weeks or below.

Please click the button below to sign the petition to the Prime Minister, asking him to do everything in his power to reduce the abortion time limit.