Select Page

‘Pro-life’ MLAs vote to ban offering support to women outside abortion clinics

A number of self-proclaimed ‘pro-life’ MLAs have voted in favour of a Bill that, if it became law, would effectively make it illegal to offer assistance, advice or even to pray in “safe access zones” outside abortion clinics and hospitals offering abortions in Northern Ireland.

The Bill, introduced by Green Party leader Clare Bailey, passed its second reading by 58 votes to 29. If the Bill becomes law, it will be a criminal offence to “influenc[e] a [person seeking an abortion], whether directly or indirectly” within a “safe access zone”.

Unlike other attempts to create a censorship zone around abortion clinics, this Bill does not specify the precise parameters in metres. It states that the censorship zone includes the “public area outside the [location where abortions are being carried out] and in the immediate vicinity”, of those premises.

Ms Bailey’s proposals were brought through Stormont in a private member’s bill and put the onus on the Department of Health to establish these censorship zones that do not permit protests, no matter how peaceful, nor offers of help or advice.

Legislation to prevent harassment already exists

Mr Jim Allister, Member of the Legislative Assembly (MLA) for the Traditional Unionist Voice, was highly critical of the proposed legislation arguing that legislation to prevent harassment already exists. He said: “Under legislation that presently exists… harassment is already a criminal offence, and under the Public Order Order 1987, disorderliness and all that goes with it is already a criminal offence. Where is the necessity to duplicate in the Bill?”

In 2018, then UK Home Secretary, Sajid Javid, when rejecting calls to introduce censorship zones outside abortion clinics in England, made the same point saying: “introducing national buffer zones would not be a proportionate response”.

“The main activities reported to us that take place during protests include praying, displaying banners and handing out leaflets. There were relatively few reports of the more aggressive activities”.

“[A]nything from a conversation to a leaflet would be deemed criminal”

While the DUP and TUV said they were strongly opposed to it, arguing it could affect the right to protest and that such legislation was unnecessary, Sinn Féin, Alliance, the SDLP and Ulster Unionist MLAs were among parties in favour of the move. 

The SDLP is a self-proclaimed pro-life party and a number of Ulster Unionist MLAs are also self-proclaimed ‘pro-life’ MLAs who court the pro-life vote in their constituencies. No SDLP or Ulster Unionist MLAs opposed the Bill. A full voting list is provided at the end of this article.

DUP MLA, Jonathan Buckley, described the bill as “regressive” saying: “Under the Bill, anything from a conversation to a leaflet would be deemed criminal. Notwithstanding whether such a definition would be enforceable in practice, that is an incredibly broad scope”.

TUV leader, Jim Allister, objected to the suggestion that “to oppose the Bill is to endorse harassment, abuse or violence. It is none of those things, and I absolutely throw back that slur, which has been cast at those of us who would dare to question the need for and the content of the Bill”.

The Bill has a number of stages to pass before it would become law.

Right To Life UK spokesperson, Catherine Robinson, said: “It was only last year that abortion was forced onto the people of Northern Ireland against their will. Now, it might be illegal to even object to this change outside an abortion clinic, regardless of how peacefully these objections are made known”.

“Proponents of such legislation typically frame it in terms of prevention of harassment and intimidation. But as Sajid Javid discovered when he investigated this in 2018, the vast majority of activity outside of these clinics is prayer, holding banners and passing out leaflets. Whenever genuine harassment takes place, it should be stopped and we already have legal mechanisms to do this”.

“Preventing people from offering assistance to those seeking an abortion is a gross form of state overreach, and a direct attack on the freedom to express the view that unborn babies and their mothers have a right to life”.

MLAs who voted YES to the Abortion Services (Safe Access Zones) Bill

Pat CatneySDLP
Mark DurkanSDLP
Dolores KellySDLP
Daniel McCrossanSDLP
Patsy McGloneSDLP
Colin McGrathSDLP
Sinead McLaughlinSDLP
Justin McNultySDLP
Nichola MallonSDLP
Matthew O’TooleSDLP
Robin SwannUUP
Steve AikenUUP
Andy AllenUUP
Rosemary BartonUUP
Doug BeattieUUP
Robbie ButlerUUP
Alan ChambersUUP
Mike NesbittUUP
John StewartUUP
Kellie ArmstrongAlliance
John BlairAlliance
Paula BradshawAlliance
Stewart DicksonAlliance
Naomi LongAlliance
Chris LyttleAlliance
Andrew MuirAlliance
Clare BaileyGreen
Rachel WoodsGreen
Trevor LunnIndependent
Claire SugdenIndependent
Gerry CarrollPeople Before Profit Alliance
Cara HunterSDLP
Caoimhe ArchibaldSinn Féin
Cathal BoylanSinn Féin
Linda DillonSinn Féin
Jemma DolanSinn Féin
Sinéad EnnisSinn Féin
Órlaithí FlynnSinn Féin
Colm GildernewSinn Féin
Declan KearneySinn Féin
Gerry KellySinn Féin
Liz KimminsSinn Féin
Declan McAleerSinn Féin
Fra McCannSinn Féin
Philip McGuiganSinn Féin
Maolíosa McHughSinn Féin
Conor MurphySinn Féin
Carál Ní ChuilínSinn Féin
John O’DowdSinn Féin
Michelle O’NeillSinn Féin
Emma RoganSinn Féin
Pat SheehanSinn Féin
Emma SheerinSinn Féin
Nicola BroganSinn Féin
Pádraig DelargySinn Féin
Ciara FergusonSinn Féin
Deirdre HargeySinn Féin
Áine MurphySinn Féin

MLAs who voted NO to the Abortion Services (Safe Access Zones) Bill

Jim WellsIndependent Unionist
Jim AllisterTraditional Unionist Voice
Maurice BradleyDUP
Paula BradleyDUP
Keith BuchananDUP
Thomas BuchananDUP
Jonathan BuckleyDUP
Joanne BuntingDUP
Pam CameronDUP
Trevor ClarkeDUP
Diane DoddsDUP
Alex EastonDUP
Paul FrewDUP
Paul GivanDUP
Harry HarveyDUP
David HilditchDUP
William HumphreyDUP
William IrwinDUP
Gordon LyonsDUP
Gary MiddletonDUP
Robin NewtonDUP
Edwin PootsDUP
George RobinsonDUP
Christopher StalfordDUP
Mervyn StoreyDUP
Peter WeirDUP
Stephen DunneDUP
Deborah ErskineDUP
Michelle McIlveenDUP

​​Dear reader,

On Friday 29 November, MPs narrowly voted to support Kim Leadbeater’s dangerous assisted suicide Bill at Second Reading.

But this is only the first step - there’s still time to stop it.

An analysis published in The Independent shows that at least 36 MPs who supported the Bill made it clear they did so only to allow time for further debate or they have concerns that mean they won’t commit to supporting the Bill at Third Reading.

With the vote passing by a margin of 55, just 28 MPs switching their stance to oppose the Bill would ensure it is defeated at Third Reading.

With more awareness of the serious risks, many MPs could change their position.

If enough do, we can defeat this Bill at Third Reading and stop it from becoming law.

You can make a difference right now by contacting your MP to vote NO at Third Reading. It only takes 30 seconds using our easy-to-use tool, which you can access by clicking the button below.