Select Page

Press release – Despite major backlash, Leadbeater goes ahead with scrapping centrepiece High Court safeguard from assisted suicide Bill

Leadbeater scraps High Court safeguard from assisted suicide Bill

PRESS RELEASE – FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Press release – Despite major backlash, Leadbeater goes ahead with scrapping centrepiece High Court safeguard from assisted suicide Bill

12 March 2025 – Despite facing a major backlash against proposals to remove the centrepiece High Court safeguard from her assisted suicide Bill, Kim Leadbeater has this afternoon proceeded to remove this flagship safeguard, by joining colleagues in voting to successfully remove the Court approval Clause (12) in the Bill.

In the build-up to the vote in November, Leadbeater boasted her Bill has “the strictest safeguards anywhere in the world”, highlighting the High Court judge safeguard as evidence for this. This provision in the Bill was repeatedly positioned by Leadbeater and her allies as a key component of the Bill.

After earlier definitively telling The Times that she would not scrap the centrepiece High Court judge safeguard in her Bill, at 10pm the night before the first day of line-by-line scrutiny, after MPs had returned to their constituencies for the February recess, Kim Leadbeater announced that she would be tabling an amendment to scrap the “safeguard” in the Bill that required a High Court judge to approve assisted suicide applications.

Leadbeater attempted to position the replacement as “Judge Plus” and was resoundingly criticised for using what many saw as a deeply misleading term.

Replaced with ‘death panels’

Leadbeater has proposed that the flagship High Court safeguard will be replaced by what has been labelled by media outlets as a ‘death tzar’ who will oversee panels, dubbed the ‘death panels’, that will include a more junior legal figure, a social worker and a psychiatrist.

Legal experts have been very critical of the new plan, highlighting several major issues with the new proposed replacement.

Including a social worker and psychiatrist on the panel will take them away from their frontline work in areas where there are already major shortages. 

In January, the Royal College of Psychiatrists revealed that 1.6 million people are waiting for mental health care, where early treatment is often essential and some people are waiting for two years or more for mental health appointments. 

A British Association of Social Workers’ survey in 2023 found “adequacy of staffing levels” and “workload demand” amongst the greatest challenges faced by social workers.

Major backlash

Since the announcement that Leadbeater would scrap this key “safeguard” in her Bill, five major national newspapersThe Independent, The Times, The Telegraph, the Daily Mail and The Sun – have run editorials that raise serious concerns about the removal of the High Court safeguard.

These major newspapers have been joined by dozens of prominent media commentators and experts who have come out against the Bill (see some of this media coverage listed below this press release). 

Bill in danger

The Independent reported that, during the Second Reading debate, 60 MPs identified the High Court judge safeguard as an important reason for their support, with a further 20 pointing to the necessity of “judicial oversight”. 

A number of MPs who supported the Bill have indicated to The Times that they are having second thoughts about voting for the Bill at Third Reading.

With the vote passing at Second Reading by a margin of 55, just 28 MPs switching their stance to oppose the Bill would ensure it is defeated at Third Reading.

One Lib Dem MP who voted for the Bill in November said the safeguard was identified “countless times”, saying “One of the most important things to me when I voted for the bill was the inclusion of a High Court judge and during the debate, that was used countless times to allay our concerns”. He added “I need to look my constituents in the eye and tell them that the safeguards are still there, and now I’m not sure I’m there”.

Lib Dem MP Alistair Carmichael, a former minister who voted for the Bill, commented that he was no longer sure about voting in favour at Third Reading, and he would need to “give it some thought”. Another former minister, Sir David Davis, also said he would study the revised proposals before coming to a decision.

Spokesperson for Right To Life UK, Catherine Robinson, said:

“Only a few months ago, Kim Leadbeater touted her Bill as having the ‘strictest safeguards in the world’, with the centrepiece safeguard in the Bill being the High Court provision.”

“Despite a major backlash, Leadbeater has now astonishingly gone ahead and scrapped this centrepiece safeguard in her Bill. She has removed the very provision that 60 MPs identified as a key reason for their support at Second Reading.”

“This dangerous Bill would place thousands of vulnerable people at risk in the coming years if it is passed. Just 28 MPs changing their stance to oppose the Bill would ensure it is defeated at Third Reading. We must now see this Bill defeated.”

ENDS 

Examples of media coverage covering the backlash against scrapping the flagship safeguard along with other recent media coverage: