Select Page

Over 100 doctors vote to have BMA investigate negative impact of Canada’s extreme euthanasia regime

Over 100 doctors voted at the BMA Annual Representative Meeting for the BMA to investigate how Canada’s extreme euthanasia regime has impacted health inequality, suicide prevention and provision of palliative care in the country.

The British Medical Association (BMA) is a trade union and professional body for doctors in the UK. 

Between 3 and 5 July, the BMA held its annual representative meeting (ARM) where it considered potential changes to bylaws and suggested amendments to the articles of association requiring approval from the annual general meeting (AGM). 

Motion 287 was proposed under the ‘Medical Ethics and Human Rights’ category, which called the “BMA board of science to investigate how the legislation of Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID) has impacted health inequality, suicide prevention and provision of palliative care in Canada.”

David Randall, a renal physician, opened the debate by noting that Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID) is deeply concerning for the poor and disadvantaged. 

Drawing on the story of Safia Kovak, who had Motor Neurone Disease and died by euthanasia in 2022, Randall quoted Safia from her self-penned obituary that “Ultimately it was not a genetic disease that took me out, it was a system. There are not enough services promoting quality of life and independence for those who are not healthy and able-bodied. I could have had more time if I had more help.”

Gillian Wright, who works in medical ethics, continued the discussion by stating that “Canada’s expansion of euthanasia in the last seven years has been nothing short of breathtaking. The systematic dismantling of safeguards is shocking.”

After hearing the opposition, David Randall closed the debate by asserting that people may be choosing not to examine the most serious cases because of anxiety about what the outcome may be. Acknowledging that supporters of assisted suicide and euthanasia may not be keen to talk about Canada and its predicament, Randall highlighted that this doesn’t mean the BMA should not talk about it. 

Despite the proposed motion being put forward, the outcome of the vote to form policy was unsuccessful. With a total of 328 votes, 34% (112) voted for the motion, 57% (187) voted against the motion and 9% (29) chose to abstain from voting. 

In 2021, 10,064 lives were ended by assisted suicide or euthanasia, an increase of over 32% from the previous year, accounting for 3.3% of all deaths in Canada.

According to the latest report on Medical Assistance in Dying from Health Canada, 17.3% of people also cited “isolation or loneliness” as a reason for wanting to die. In 35.7% of cases, patients believed that they were a “burden on family, friends or caregivers”

Motion on ‘DIY’ abortion safeguards

Towards the end of the ARM, there were 10 emergency motions chosen. Proposed by Gregory Gardner, motion 1010 was based on the recent case where, the British Pregnancy Advisory Service, sent out abortion pills to a woman whose baby, Lily, was at least 32 weeks gestation.

The motion outlined that “As a duty of care to women the following changes should be made to abortion practice:-

i) there should be an end to the scapegoating of women for the failure of abortion providers to provide adequate safeguards; 

ii) whenever possible, consultations for medical abortion should be carried out face to face, in order for a more thorough clinical assessment, including a proper estimation of gestational age; 

iii) the extent of abortion failure should be data driven and known by all commissioning bodies.” 

Despite the motion being tabled, the motion was not discussed due to lack of time. 

Right To Life UK spokesperson Catherine Robinson said “The poor, marginalised and disadvantaged are being failed by the medical system in Canada and instead of fixing the system, it appears that the solution being offered to some is the ending of their lives through euthanasia or assisted suicide. It’s vital that people in the UK are aware of how bad the situation in Canada is and that, as a country, we chose to focus on caring for those who are ill rather than seeking to introduce assisted suicide or euthanasia.”

URGENT
APPEAL
to protect vulnerable lives

Help stop three major anti-life threats.

Help fight the next phase of our battles against major assisted suicide and abortion up to birth threats.

Dear reader,

We are facing two major threats in the Lords - an extreme assisted suicide Bill and an abortion up to birth amendment.

THE GOOD NEWS - OUR STRATEGY IS WORKING

At Second Reading of the Leadbeater assisted suicide Bill in the House of Lords, a record number of Peers spoke, and of those who took a position, around two-thirds opposed the assisted suicide Bill. That is more than double the number who supported it.

Our side also secured a significant win, with the establishment of a dedicated Lords Select Committee to further scrutinise the Bill’s proposals – and Committee Stage has been delayed until it reports.

This momentum has been built by tens of thousands of people like you. Thanks to your hard work, Peers are receiving a very large number of emails and letters by post, making the case against the Bill. 

Thanks to your support, we have been able to mount a major campaign in Parliament, in the media and online – alongside your own efforts – to keep us on course for our goal: that this dangerous Bill never becomes law.

BUT MORE CHALLENGES LIE AHEAD

We cannot become complacent. Well-funded groups - Dignity in Dying, My Death My Decision and Humanists UK - have poured millions into pushing assisted suicide. They can see support is slipping and will fight hard to reverse that.

This is not the only fight we are facing in the House of Lords.

At the same time, the Antoniazzi abortion up to birth amendment, which passed in the House of Commons in June, is moving through the House of Lords as part of the Crime and Policing Bill.

Second Reading will take place in a matter of weeks. It will then go on to Committee and Report Stages, where we will be up against the UK’s largest abortion providers – BPAS and MSI Reproductive Choices (formerly Marie Stopes) – who are expected to lobby for even more extreme changes to our abortion laws.

If the Antoniazzi amendment becomes law, it would no longer be illegal for women to perform their own abortions for any reason – including sex-selective purposes – at any point up to and during birth.

Thousands of vulnerable lives - at the beginning and the end of life - depend on what happens next. We must do everything in our power to stop these radical proposals.

WE NEED YOUR HELP

Our campaign against the Leadbeater Bill in the House of Lords is working, but the work we have already done has significantly stretched our limited resources.

We are now stepping up our efforts against the assisted suicide Bill while launching a major push to stop the abortion up to birth amendment in the Lords. 

To fight effectively on both fronts, we aim to raise £183,750 by midnight this Sunday (5 October 2025).

Every donation, large or small, will help protect lives, and UK taxpayers can add 25p to every £1 through Gift Aid at no extra cost.

Will you donate now to help protect vulnerable lives from these two major threats?

URGENT
APPEAL
to protect vulnerable lives

Help stop three major anti-life threats.

Help fight the next phase of our battles against major assisted suicide and abortion up to birth threats.