Select Page

Lack of coroner oversight in assisted suicide bill risks hiding unlawful deaths

Fresh concerns have been raised that, under Kim Leadbeater’s assisted suicide Bill, criminal wrongdoing in relation to assistance in suicide may go unnoticed due to the absence of coroner involvement.

The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill, as introduced to the House of Lords, amends the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 to ensure there is no statutory duty to investigate deaths “caused by the self-administration by the deceased of an approved substance”. This means that under Kim Leadbeater’s Bill, the deaths of those who die by assisted suicide would not be automatically referred to a coroner, as is normally required in cases of “unnatural deaths” or those caused by the administration of drugs.

As the assisted suicide Bill heads to the House of Lords, Tom McNeill, a partner at BCL Solicitors, shared his concerns that “without formal scrutiny some deaths could appear unexplained”.

“Without a meaningful investigation, there is no way to determine whether offences have been committed, or the requirements in the act have been met. Unevidenced concerns reported to the coroner or police are unlikely to be investigated. Yet without a meaningful investigation, no evidence will emerge to support those concerns”.

Lack of coroner oversight a “key question” when Bill goes to House of Lords

McNeill said the lack of a coroner’s involvement would be “a key question” when the Bill is scrutinised in the House of Lords.

In the build-up to the Third Reading vote, the Royal College of Pathologists (RCPath) said “that deaths following assisted [suicide] should be notified to the coroner, just as other deaths following the administration of drugs, prescribed or not, must be”.

Agreeing with this point of view, McNeill said “Declarations by independent doctors and panel review before death, or by a medical examiner afterwards, are not comparable to a publicly conducted judicial investigation”. 

McNeill added further concerns about the presence of “real risks of abuse”, saying “Concerns also arise when the failings originate with the medical professionals concerned in the assisted dying process. There are real risks of abuse, as evidenced by the widely reported misuse of ‘do not resuscitate orders’, which were at times applied by doctors without consent, under pressure, or even applied to entire groups such as those in care homes”.

Judge Thomas Teague KC, chief coroner of England and Wales from 2020 to 2024, pointed out that a coroner’s role acted as “a powerful deterrent against wrongdoing”. In a letter to The Times, Teague wrote “The coroner’s statutory duty to investigate all unnatural deaths, irrespective of whether any misfeasance is alleged, provides a powerful deterrent against wrongdoing”.

In another letter, Teague commented “Since the coroner’s jurisdiction affords a powerful deterrent against misfeasance, the public may wonder why the Bill proposes to abandon such a robust safeguard”.

Leadbeater Bill could face legal challenge

McNeill said “The state must ensure it complies with its duty under the European Convention on Human Rights to conduct an effective investigation”.

McNeill highlighted further concerns raised by Teague, saying “He also flags that without an inquest there will be no post-mortem examination and therefore no definitive means of determining whether the disease met the legal criteria or the circumstances of death complied with the law. For instance, there would be no reliable way to determine whether the approved substance led to a quick and painless death or a distressing and, perhaps, unlawful one”.

Spokesperson for Right To Life UK, Catherine Robinson, said “Tom McNeill is correct to highlight the lack of a coroner’s oversight as a matter of deep concern in the extreme Leadbeater Bill”.

“These small details are significant, and the lack of coroner’s oversight is obviously open to abuse. This is unacceptable. Hopefully the scrutiny the Lords will bring upon this reckless Bill will see it fall once and for all”.

“We will be fighting this Bill at every stage in the House of Lords, where we are confident it can be overturned given its continued loss of support”.

URGENT
APPEAL
to protect vulnerable lives

Help stop three major anti-life threats.

Help fight major assisted suicide and abortion up to birth threats.

Dear reader,

Despite the Leadbeater assisted-suicide Bill passing its Third Reading on 20 June, it scraped through by just 23 votes (314-291) after enjoying a 55-vote majority at Second Reading. Had 12 more MPs switched sides, the Bill would be dead. It now limps into the Lords with a wafer-thin majority, where peers can amend, delay or reject it outright.

THE CHALLENGE

Dignity in Dying, My Death My Decision and Humanists UK have poured millions into pushing assisted suicide and will fight hard to stop the Lords overturning the Bill.

At the same time, the Antoniazzi abortion-up-to-birth amendment, passed by MPs in June, also heads to the Lords. If it becomes law, it would no longer be illegal for women to perform their own abortions for any reason – including sex-selective purposes – and at any point up to and during birth.

We will be up against the UK’s largest abortion providers, BPAS and MSI Reproductive Choices (formerly Marie Stopes), who are expected to push for even more extreme changes to our abortion laws in the Lords.

WE NEED YOUR HELP

Thousands of vulnerable lives are now at stake. Battling these two threats is the biggest and most expensive effort in our history, and has drained our limited resources. To fight effectively on both fronts, we aim to raise £200,000 by midnight this Sunday (13 July 2025).

Every donation, large or small, will help protect lives, and UK taxpayers can add 25p to every £1 through Gift Aid at no extra cost.

Will you make a donation now to help protect vulnerable lives from these major threats?

URGENT
APPEAL
to protect vulnerable lives

Help stop three major anti-life threats.

Help fight major assisted suicide and abortion up to birth threats.