Select Page

Peers make strong case against introducing assisted suicide to Inquiry

Baroness Finlay and Baroness Hollins both made a strong case against assisted suicide in the first evidence session of the Health and Social Care Committee inquiry on assisted suicide held yesterday. 

In her opening remarks, Baroness Finlay, a doctor, professor of palliative medicine and past president of the Royal Society of Medicine, shared a powerful story about a man she was treating who was “desperate for euthanasia”. She said that her colleagues thought that he would live for no more than three months. With great difficulty, she persuaded him that she would try and relieve his symptoms. The man told her that he would give her two weeks before he killed himself. She went on to say “11 years later, he phoned me because his wife was dying. She died in my care with his children at her bedside and him in a wheelchair. He is still alive today.”

She rebutted several points regarding the quality of life of those in palliative care made by Baroness Meacher, the chair of the campaign group, Dignity in Dying. She concluded by sharing her personal experience with her mother. Her mother was strongly in favour of euthanasia. 

“When she was dying and we thought she had six weeks to live, she was extremely angry with me that I’d opposed it [euthanasia]. Four years later, she said that she was really glad and that she had the most incredibly rewarding time seeing her grandson born and so on”. 

Baroness Hollins, professor of the psychiatry of learning disability, past president of the Royal College of Psychiatrists and past president of the British Medical Association, also shared important information about the disproportionate effect that assisted suicide can have on individuals with learning disabilities and autism. She said that assumptions are being made about the quality of life of individuals with disabilities. 

Death by asphyxiation

In response to a question from Chris Green MP and comments from other panellists, Baroness Finlay explained that defining terminal illness is a very difficult task, pointing out that, under a previous Bill brought forward by Baroness Meacher, an 18-year-old girl suffering from anorexia could be eligible for an assisted suicide, as would a diabetic individual dependent on insulin.

She also noted that diagnostic error is quite common, saying that there have been examples from Canada of people who had been euthanised but never had the illness. In response to examples being brought forward by Baroness Meacher and Lord Falconer from the state of Oregon in the US, she said that only 2% of doctors in the state were actually involved in the process of assisted suicide and that the claims that this was a widespread practice were inaccurate. 

She also noted that, in a survey undertaken by British Medical Association (BMA), “the highest opposition was amongst those clinicians who deal with these patients, look after these patients all the time”.

She went on to cite concerns about the drugs being used for euthanasia and assisted suicide, saying that “nowhere in the world have these drugs been approved by any authority for repurposing”. She also spoke about the reality of euthanasia using the example of Belgium. 

“Over two-thirds of patients in Belgium were given a short-acting anaesthetic agent. But then, they also were given curare. That meant every muscle was paralysed. They would have looked as if they were peaceful but they were dying of asphyxia.”

One in five cite loneliness as a reason to want to die

In 2021, 10,064 people ended their lives by assisted suicide and euthanasia in Canada, an increase of over 32% from the previous year, accounting for 3.3% of all deaths in Canada.

According to the latest report on Medical Assistance in Dying from Health Canada, 17.3% of people also cited “isolation or loneliness” as a reason for wanting to die. In 35.7% of cases, patients believed that they were a “burden on family, friends or caregivers”.

Right To Life UK spokesperson Catherine Robinson said “The warnings from Baroness Hollins on the effect legalising assisted suicide would have on individuals with disabilities, and Baroness Finlay’s points on the dangers of euthanasia, must be taken seriously. Introducing assisted suicide in England and Wales would be very dangerous for those who are vulnerable and would place a significant burden on doctors who would be the ones expected to be involved in the deaths of their patients.”

URGENT
APPEAL
to protect vulnerable lives

Help stop three major anti-life threats.

Help fight the next phase of our battles against major assisted suicide and abortion up to birth threats.

Dear reader,

We are facing two major threats in the Lords - an extreme assisted suicide Bill and an abortion up to birth amendment.

THE GOOD NEWS - OUR STRATEGY IS WORKING

At Second Reading of the Leadbeater assisted suicide Bill in the House of Lords, a record number of Peers spoke, and of those who took a position, around two-thirds opposed the assisted suicide Bill. That is more than double the number who supported it.

Our side also secured a significant win, with the establishment of a dedicated Lords Select Committee to further scrutinise the Bill’s proposals – and Committee Stage has been delayed until it reports.

This momentum has been built by tens of thousands of people like you. Thanks to your hard work, Peers are receiving a very large number of emails and letters by post, making the case against the Bill. 

Thanks to your support, we have been able to mount a major campaign in Parliament, in the media and online – alongside your own efforts – to keep us on course for our goal: that this dangerous Bill never becomes law.

BUT MORE CHALLENGES LIE AHEAD

We cannot become complacent. Well-funded groups - Dignity in Dying, My Death My Decision and Humanists UK - have poured millions into pushing assisted suicide. They can see support is slipping and will fight hard to reverse that.

This is not the only fight we are facing in the House of Lords.

At the same time, the Antoniazzi abortion up to birth amendment, which passed in the House of Commons in June, is moving through the House of Lords as part of the Crime and Policing Bill.

Second Reading will take place in a matter of weeks. It will then go on to Committee and Report Stages, where we will be up against the UK’s largest abortion providers – BPAS and MSI Reproductive Choices (formerly Marie Stopes) – who are expected to lobby for even more extreme changes to our abortion laws.

If the Antoniazzi amendment becomes law, it would no longer be illegal for women to perform their own abortions for any reason – including sex-selective purposes – at any point up to and during birth.

Thousands of vulnerable lives - at the beginning and the end of life - depend on what happens next. We must do everything in our power to stop these radical proposals.

WE NEED YOUR HELP

Our campaign against the Leadbeater Bill in the House of Lords is working, but the work we have already done has significantly stretched our limited resources.

We are now stepping up our efforts against the assisted suicide Bill while launching a major push to stop the abortion up to birth amendment in the Lords. 

To fight effectively on both fronts, we aim to raise £183,750 by midnight this Sunday (5 October 2025).

Every donation, large or small, will help protect lives, and UK taxpayers can add 25p to every £1 through Gift Aid at no extra cost.

Will you donate now to help protect vulnerable lives from these two major threats?

URGENT
APPEAL
to protect vulnerable lives

Help stop three major anti-life threats.

Help fight the next phase of our battles against major assisted suicide and abortion up to birth threats.